U.S. Senate Committee on Intelligence

Links to Iraq Intelligence Phase II Report (link provided below)

First, my pictures are of a meeting which took place in the winter of 2000 and not of a April 9, 2001 alleged meeting between Atta and al Ani.  So no one should become confused with the dates.

According to the Senate Committee on Intelligence,  this is what al Ani told his FBI interrogators, but what he said and claims does not surprise me. Spies do cover their tracks, and al Ani would have covered his tracks after he learned that we were attempting to make a connection. As for the undated document recovered, that would be part of his cover, a planted document disavowing a meeting. No one should ever expect al Ani to tell anyone he met with lead hijacker Mohammed Atta in Prague "on any date" and incriminate himself.

Notice how the Senate Intelligence Committee does not acknowledge or report openly, on my pictures showing Atta meeting with al Ani during the winter of 2000.  Possibly, could it be that some former high level official dropped the ball on this one?

I bet al Ani was very surprised, especially after he saw surveillance photo's of himself and with Atta.

Vice President Cheney on Meet the Press with Tim Russert (link in red below)

Vice President Cheney today on Meet the Press confirmed the existence of my photo's. He also detailed that there have been several different reports of Atta in Prague.

Concerning my pictures, if I understand the Vice President correctly, he says the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. cannot verify that Atta was with al Ani in Prague . Well of course not. He was trained in the Afghanistan terrorist training camps to plan, work and travel undetected.

As I discussed before, Atta was using fake passports. The 9-11 commission confirmed in their report Atta was trained in altering passport identifications. You can also be sure he was trained in counter surveillance methods. After all, he was the al Qaeda operational commander and they were in the planning stages for 9-11 and would have wanted to go undetected so as not to compromise the operation.

I never published the large picture located above before April 4, 2006. I published a smaller and darker picture in October of 2002 to protect what I felt was vital intelligence and interest. In part of my  analysis, not disclosed until April 2006, the larger photo above shows moles located near the  right side of the eyebrow at exactly the same locations as on smaller photo's of Atta located above. 

If I can crack FSB/KGB intelligence operations with a high degree of accuracy, surely, with a 98% degree of confidence based on my photographic analysis, the man with al Ani in the large picture is 9-11 terrorist Mohammed Atta.

TW 9/10/2006

On this additional part of my analysis I kept secret, you will see on the large photo located above that was taken in Prague, moles located just to the right side of the chin/lower jaw area also matches with the black and white photo of Atta.

The picture on the left hand side below, with the exception of what I have highlighted, is in its original form that was released by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) after the 9-11 attacks.

In the black and white photo's located above and below on the right hand side, you will notice the moles on the on the right side of Atta's face behind the chin area, are not seen as easily in the color picture released by FDOT.  The reason they were not seen in the photo released by FDOT, is because there has been an intentional attempt at covering up (photo shopped) the identifying markings and obscuring the unique shape and depth of his chin/jaw area.

I am not inclined to believe the camera for some reason, did not focus on that area correctly because the disturbance does not extend beyond Atta's facial outline and is limited only to the chin and jaw area..

I have ruled out that FDOT would allow touch-ups of a photo for a driver's license, and if Atta was using cosmetic make-up to cover up his markings, this would not cause a pixelation disturbance as the photo's clearly show.

The type of camera used, according to FDOT (confirmed), was a digital camera.

                                          Original Picture                                  Converted To Grayscale ( X-Rayed )

added 7/30/2007: "The type of camera used, according to FDOT (confirmed), was a digital camera".

There have been numerous attempts to discredit the Atta meeting with Saddam’s intelligence official Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim al Ani in Prague of the Czech Republic. None of which were so blatantly obvious and I believe with possible malicious intent, than when the New York Times (using unnamed sources) attempted to discredit a meeting in Prague very early on in October of 2002.

The New York Times ran the article on October 21, 2002 stating as fact the President of the Czech Republic discretely called the White House and reported there was not any evidence the meeting occurred.

But the New York Times report was precisely and swiftly denied as a "fabrication".

The following report was published on 10/22/2002 (with full attribution) on the matter: CZECH REPUBLIC PRESIDENTIAL SPOKESMAN REJECTS 'NY TIMES' REPORT AS 'FABRICATION.' A spokesman for Czech President Vaclav Havel has dismissed a report in "The New York Times" claiming Havel told U.S. officials there is no evidence that suspected 11 September hijacker Mohammad Atta met an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague, CTK reported on 22 October. The 21 October report cited unidentified Czech officials as saying Havel discreetly called White House officials to cast doubt on the alleged meeting. "It is a fabrication. Nothing like this has occurred," Havel's spokesman, Ladislav Spacek, said of the alleged phone conversation". ("RFE/RL Newsline," 22 October)

Link to report: RADIO FREE EUROPE/ RADIO LIBERTY  (about half way down the page) 

"The photo's are supporting evidence". No amount of disinformation and or faulty reporting can change that".

The other covertly snapped photo (above) shows Saddam's intelligence official al Ani in a surveillance operation against an American interest. RFE/RL is an American interest.

Another fact. On Oct. 21,2002, the New York Times was reporting the alleged meeting of April 2001 was discredited. But, I know differently (with solid proof). To the contrary, the alleged April 2001 meeting was still being debated in Prague at the time of their reporting on 10/21/2002. To reiterate, my photo's are of a meeting "during the winter of 2000", not of the alleged April 2001 meeting.

What is very interesting, is the fact I published the photo's for the first time on 10/22/2002, which coincides with the reporting.. Someone knew I was going to publish those photo's, and tried to obfuscate (confuse) the facts.

TW 4/7/2008

Updated 10/29/08 TW