| Presidential Elections 2004
In the end, its going to be the economy - and the war
By Ted
Weaver
03/15/2002
I think President G. W. Bush and our armed services
are doing a magnificent job on the war effort to root out and neutralize
all of the AI Qaeda terrorist and the Taliban soldiers in Afghanistan.
The actions have been quick and decisive. In a short time, the
administration has been able to build a relatively large coalition of
countries in support of eradicating the terrorist threat worldwide. The
80% nationwide approval ratings for the president are indicative of the
successes to date for the administration.
The future actions by this president, with regards to
the war on terrorism, I think is going to be just as precise and
aggressive, as has been demonstrated thus far in protecting the homeland
against future terrorist and other types of attacks. But in just a short
2 years from now, the presidential election machine will get up and
running full steam and the democrats will be looking for ammo to degrade
this president and his administration.
Naturally, what comes to mind in the present is the
stock market scams which really took off during the Clinton
administration, like the Enron mess or the Global Crossing and a whole
hoard of others. No, I don't think its going to be this. Feathers just
don't stick to cold tar. Though I'm sure they will try to heat some up.
As the old adage goes -history repeats itself over and
over - what comes to mind is the 1992 presidential election in which
then, a little known Arkansas governor upset the poll rating scheme of
things.
The first Pres. Geo. Bush was riding high (in polls)
on incredible successes of the military operations in the Middle East
dubbed operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. This wars effort saw a
very minimal amount of casualties in relations to the size in number of
the military personnel used. Built an unprecedented large coalition of
countries worldwide and reasserted the prestige of Americas military
back where it belonged. Nor were there any major scandals that one can
easily remember .
Then we saw the what seemed like a perpetual downward
slide in the poll numbers over a short period of time. Obviously, there
wasn't much to complain about except for the economy. Being in a
recession then, the democrats came out swinging. Using the mood of this
nations economy to its benefit.
Divide and conquer -an old military ploy. What I
thought that was such a huge success for the democrats was the ploy they
used in the 1992 presidential election which was scaring a large segment
of the elderly and senior citizens into thinking the Republicans and the
then Bush administration was going to take away their social security
benefits and others. How untrue that was, but lets face it, there was a
huge segment of the older population that believed what they were
hearing from the liberal leaning TV news programs and the DNC election
ads. The next thing you knew, your grandmother was telling you that the
-son of a gun -was going to take away seniors social security. Of
course, she heard this rumor from others too. A lot of voting seniors
were convinced that this was the case. Just try to convince a scared
senior citizen otherwise!
Another area of democrat strategy will be I suppose is
that if the AI Qaeda and Taliban leaders Osama Bin Laden and Mullah
Ohmar aren't brought back in some way, this will be used by the
liberals, as an argument against any future operations and as to why we
shouldn't progress on the war against terror or consider the Afghanistan
involvement a total success -they'll try it.
Already, we are seeing stiff democratic resistance to
U.S. becoming more independent from foreign oil sources and the impetus
being placed in front of the President preventing him from helping to
bring in almost one "trillion" much needed dollars to the U.S. economy.
I suppose that the summer time -black fly infested area known as Anwar,
Alaska -is more important than the U.S. economy. This just proves to
what extreme the demmies will go to sabotage the economy. Black flies
first, then the working people of the United States. Anything to make
the republicans look bad when it comes to the economy for the sake of
future elections.
One of the brighter spots for the republicans is the
fact that there now is a larger, and more organized conservative media.
I'll give the scandal ridden Clinton/Gore administration credit for
inciting this increase. The republicans won't let the democrats get away
with their disinformation campaigns anymore.
I think that one of the reasons the economy is
partially recessed is because of the attitudes of the American people.
They appear to be slightly depressed and cautious after 9/11. I would
think more cautious than depressed. There really is no reason to be any
more. Were in good hands I feel. I think what we need to do is tell the
population to go out and spend money, this is important. Buy more
products and services. Help to do the patriotic thing, keep the American
economy strong which would be a good way to contribute. Its not as much
consumer confidence spending as much as it really is just plain
confidence in our country and society in general. You see, those
scum-bag terrorist weren't just making a statement that they could cause
massive destruction to two tall buildings, but there was a much more
devious act perpetrated -to slow us down and hurt our economic well
being and to manipulate our foreign and domestic policies.
For in the end, when the presidential elections come
around in 2004, barring any unforeseeable scandals or unforeseen
terrorist strikes on the country, no doubt, it will be the economy again
and what has been achieved in the war on terror both in present and in
future operations. |