|



Barack Obama sacks adviser over talks with
Hamas
Robert Malley told The Times that
he had been in regular contact with Hamas, which controls Gaza
and is listed by the US State Department as a terrorist
organization
TimesOnline.co.uk
Obama Promises Improved Ties With Egypt,
Syria
Aides said Obama had sent senior foreign policy adviser
Robert Malley to Egypt and Syria over the last few weeks to outline
the Democratic
candidate's policy on the Middle East.
MiddleEastNewsline
Report: Obama lied about firing anti-Israel
advisor
Robert Malley, a top Middle East advisor that US President
elect Barack Obama promised months ago would play no role in his
administration due to ties to Hamas, has reportedly been sent out on the
next administration's first diplomatic mission
IsraelToday.co.il
Report: Obama Sends Advisor
Malley to Cozy Up to Egypt and Syria
One of the sponsors of the International Crisis Group
is billionaire George Soros, who sits on its board and
its executive committee. Other members of the board include former United States
National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski,
and former general Wesley Clark.
IsraelNatNews.com
Stock Market Goes Into Tailspin After Obama
Elected U.S.
Stocks Drop on concern Obama will struggle to reverse slowing economy.
Bloomberg.com
Obama campaign workers angry over unpaid
wages
"I want my money today! It's my money. I want
it right now!" yelled one former campaign worker.
WTHR.com
Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania ?
Townhall's Amanda Carpenter reports on
a tip that voting machines in Philadelphia showed votes for Barack Obama
-- before polls opened
RightSideNews.com
A Repeat of 2004 Philly
Voter Chaos, Fraud - GOP
Election Board members have been tossed out of polling stations in at least half
a dozen polling stations in Philadelphia because of their party status.
TownHall.com
| |
| Opinion & Analysis:
First Impressions
Is he combative, defiant and or sending signals?
By Ted Weaver
In case anyone hasn’t noticed, Saddam is a lot more
than just agitated. Reading some of his comments and watching his body
language, it appeared as though there is a lot more going on than just
observing the actions of a trapped rat. Definitely more than the basic
survival instincts involved.
One will never forget that Saddam ruled through fear. Which his regime
methodically instilled on its citizens through the use of terror and
torture. Some of the statements Saddam made to the judge like this one
in particular struck me, “Why would you behave in a manner that we might
call hasty later on?” It seemed to me Saddam was actually saying “if
this new government fails, I‘ll be back, and you're history buddy“.
Courtroom observers have stated that Saddam seemed to be in charge at
times.
Make no mistake, Saddam wasn’t only hiding for his life, he was helping
to direct guerilla operations against the coalition forces, and make it
so miserable for the coalition by killing and maiming large numbers of
troops that we would retreat. Somewhat similar in nature to what
happened in Viet Nam.
Saddam learned many years ago how to use the cameras and video. And
yesterday when he was arraigned, it was no different. The multitude of
facial expressions, the bulging eyes and intimidating like statements
and gestures, it became clear that Saddam was trying to intimidate the
court and rile up the supporters. This is just the sort of thing that
will do, just what he intended it to do. Of what degree remains to be
seen. What concerns me is that of the Sunni Triangle region, like that
of Fallujah.
His actions seemed to be that he believes the insurgency will continue.
Now whether he is bluffing or knows something of a long term plan and or
is having delusion of grandeur are good questions. If I had to take an
educated guess, I’d say that he believes this insurgency will continue.
Then on another related topic, he seemed to know a little too much about
current events. He is definitely getting news from somewhere. I wondered
if he has access to a TV or radio. If Saddam is left to, he will turn
this trial into a circus.
I was really surprised that the interim government wanted to start to
try him and not wait for the elected government to undertake the whole
show. Personally, I wouldn’t have wanted even a slightest suggestion
that Saddam’s trial was slanted by an interim government. The message
that it could send to the triangle could be construed as being
inflammatory and could have costly ramifications. Maybe that is what
Saddam is banking on. On the other hand, for reasons unknown, the right
decision to start the process to try him by the interim government may
be the correct approach. Perhaps this will give the Iraqi’s a little
more hope for the future. Only time will tell.
I’ve observed Saddam work things before during photo ops and video. And
believe me, he knows how to do it. I’m seriously beginning to wonder if
releasing large numbers of photographs of him on trial is wise.
Similarly, his flaming like statements. I was always one to believe in a
strategy of defusing rather than inciting in certain types of
situations. As is the case here. 7/02/2004 |
| |
|