Home
Most Recent Articles
The Political Corner

Barack Obama sacks adviser over talks with Hamas               Robert Malley told    The Times that he    had been in regular contact with Hamas, which controls Gaza and is listed by the    US State Department as a terrorist organization   TimesOnline.co.uk

Obama Promises Improved Ties With Egypt, Syria            Aides said Obama had sent senior foreign policy adviser Robert Malley to Egypt and Syria over the last few weeks to outline        the Democratic
candidate's policy on the Middle East.         MiddleEastNewsline

Report: Obama lied about firing anti-Israel advisor                Robert Malley, a top Middle East advisor  that US President   elect Barack Obama promised months ago would play no role in  his administration due to ties to Hamas, has reportedly been sent  out on the next administration's first diplomatic mission IsraelToday.co.il

Report: Obama  Sends Advisor   Malley to Cozy Up    to Egypt and Syria  One of the sponsors of the International Crisis Group is billionaire George Soros, who   sits on its board and   its executive committee. Other members of the board include former United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy  Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and    former general    Wesley Clark.    
IsraelNatNews.com
 

Stock Market Goes Into Tailspin After Obama Elected       U.S. Stocks Drop on concern Obama will struggle to reverse slowing economy.    Bloomberg.com

Obama campaign workers angry over unpaid wages           "I want my money today! It's my money.    I want it right now!" yelled one former campaign worker. WTHR.com

Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania ?       Townhall's Amanda Carpenter reports on    a tip that voting machines in Philadelphia showed votes for Barack  Obama -- before polls opened
RightSideNews.com

A Repeat of 2004 Philly Voter Chaos, Fraud - GOP Election Board members have been tossed out of polling stations in at least half a dozen polling stations in Philadelphia because  of their party status. TownHall.com

 

 

 

 

 

 
Experts Debunk New York Times Story

David Albright, a physicist, and President of the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) in Washington, D.C, discusses the information contained in the documentation stored in the alleged stolen laptop computer with Radio Farda November 22, 2005.

He challenged and disputed the New York Times reporting in several areas and had concerns of the role played by the New York Times.

David Albright states that he does not believe the laptop computer was stolen. Nor did I. According to the information Mr. Albright received, it was given from a person inside Iran who has since subsequently died to another who then carried it out of Iran. But I personally don't believe that entire rendition either. Just because it makes more sense doesn't mean its accurate, only more plausible.

The most revealing of this suppressed news is that Mr. Albright, wrote a letter to the New York Times on the matter and contacted one of the writers of the article. The writer told him that he too, was highly skeptical of the story but that the editors of the Times demanded they write it. (an expert told me that this was how any newspaper worked)

And then another expert, Miriam Rajkumar, who is an associate at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace went on the record as saying she does not buy into the stolen laptop New York Times headline either. She believes the timing was to coincide with the upcoming IAEA events.

That is probably true. But to benefit whom? On one hand, planting false and or misleading information could help a foreign intelligence service poison and discredit legitimately gathered intelligence. Likewise, the planting of a disinformation story for later political gain.

On the other hand, would someone in our intelligence or government deliberately plant false information in a psychological operation that carries with it a extremely high risk for a short term gain or purpose? Which would only rise up later like the curveball debacle did and cause damage to our credibility and make one big political mess.

To me, David Albrights analysis actually confirms what I believed before and this information is part of a nuclear missile weapon design. Because in my way of thinking, and I'm not trying to be disrespectful, but if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it is a duck. But just because it doesn't have the wording duck imprinted on it, doesn't mean its not a duck.

David Albright says he is familiar with the documents and they have been out there for over a year and they are old news dating from the 2001 - 2003 period. He asserts the actual designs appear to be for a reentry vehicle for a nuclear armed missile and not a design for an actual nuclear warhead as the New York Times reports. However, a nuclear warhead is described in the documents in conjunction with the purported nuclear reentry vehicle design.

Since the New York Times has been involved in planting disinformation and false stories in the past concerning intelligence matters on occasions, David Albright, like myself, seemed particularly disturbed the New York Times was involved in something like this again that started with the obvious BS story of a stolen Iranian laptop computer. 

One fact that cannot be debated or ignored, is the Iranians have admittedly received documentation from A. Q. Khan network.

Listen To The Interview on 11/22/2005 With Radio Farda and David Albright using ( click here Real Audio) or (click here Windows Media) Source: Rferl.org

Listen To The Interview on 11/22/2005 With Radio Farda and Miriam Rajkumar using (click here Real Audio) or (click here Windows Media) Source: Rferl.org

TW 12/19/2005