Home
Most Recent Articles
The Political Corner


Russia 'backed Litvinenko murder' -  The murder of former Russian agent Alexander Litvinenko was carried out with the backing of the Russian state, Whitehall sources told the BBC. .    BBC.co.uk

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown Had Frank Talks With Medvedev At G-8 - "According to media reports, the discussion was "very frank," but Medvedev refused to cede any ground to Brown" RFE/RL.org

Bully-boy Russia needs a lesson in manners
PM Brown Asked Medvedev To Turn Over Prime Suspect Lugovoi, Medvedev said no. Telegraph.co.uk

New spy claim hits Russia-UK ties -      Russian security officials have accused a British diplomat based in Moscow of spying, Russian news agencies report. BBC.co UK

British Diplomat Labeled Spy -         "Russian special services have questions about the work of Christopher Bowers, the British Embassy's counselor and, presumably, a senior British intelligence officer, who in the early 1990s worked under the 'cover' of a BBC correspondent in Tashkent," the source said, Interfax reported. TheMoscowTimes.com

London-Moscow relations worsen as the Kremlin brand a British envoy a spy -             They 'unmasked' him in retaliation for what they saw as Britain's provocative and bungling actions ahead of Gordon Brown's meeting with new Kremlin leader Dmitry Medvedev three days ago at the G8 summit.      DailyMail.co.UK


Moscow Angles For Respect With The EU - BRUSSELS - On the eve of talks on a new bilateral agreement between Russia and the EU, President Dmitry Medvedev appears to be following the course set by Vladimir Putin. - RFE/RL.org


The Anthrax Fiasco - The FBI's mad scientist theory also fit the agenda of the political left, which didn't want the trail of evidence to prove state-sponsorship of terror – particularly by Iraq. (Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times pushed the Hatfill theory of the case especially hard.) But the possibility of a foreign source should never have been downplayed. WSJ.com


Sarkozy cuts 50,000 military jobs to invest in intelligence -            "We cannot exclude the reappearance of a major threat ... We know that tomorrow it can take on a new form, even more serious, with radiological, chemical and biological resources." Guardian.co.uk


Bush Compliments Sarkozy On Wife -   Pres. Bush heaped praise on French first lady Carla Bruni, describing her as "a really smart, capable woman". BBC.co.uk


Bush `Disappointed' Iran Dismisses Nuclear Proposals -                   Pres. Bush: "Our allies understand that a nuclear-armed Iran is incredibly destabilizing, and they understand it would be a major blow to world peace" Bloomberg.com  


Bush, Sarkozy warn Syria, Iran -       Sarkozy: "Iran getting a nuclear bomb is unacceptable, that's clear. It's an unacceptable threat for the stability of the world," AFP.Google.com


Bush: No regrets over Iraq invasion - "Removing Saddam Hussein made the world a safer place," - CNN.com


Senator Bond: Phase II Report is Political Theatre - WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Kit Bond, Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, today admonished Democrats for playing politics with the final reports on prewar Iraq intelligence to score election-year points - Intelligence.Senate.Gov


Analysis: With Transition, Power In Russia Moves Further Into The Shadows - "Prime Minister Putin, naturally, will concentrate in his own hands all power, except a few 'status items,' while Comrade Medvedev at first will have about as much authority as Princess Anna in 'Roman Holiday' had," RFE/RL.org

   Vladimir Putin's Tough Talk About Nato -        Apr. 4 - Vladimir Putin says NATO's expansion eastwards is a direct threat to Russia's security. Putin said that "Russia does not aspire to become a NATO member , thank God". Putin also warned that "there will be interesting times ahead" with the new incoming Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, meaning Putin will be Russia's Prime Minister and will still be pulling the strings, for continuity. TW 4/5/08 Youtube.com


Russia: Moscow Expels 2 U.S. Officials; Washington Downplays Move - The U.S. government says Russia has expelled two U.S. military attaches. The order follows the expulsion of two Russians from Washington in the past six months - RFE/RL.org


Russia: Putin Hands Reins To Medvedev, But Remains In Control - Few in Russia see the handover as anything but cosmetic. Putin still enjoys enormous support among Russians, and it is widely thought that he will continue to run the country from the prime minister's office as head of the government - RFE/RL.org


U.S.: Iran Named As Top State Sponsor Of Terrorism - The U.S. State Department has issued its annual report on terrorism around the world. The report concludes that Iran is the world's "most-active" state sponsor of terrorism due to its continued support for Hizballah in Lebanon, the Palestinian militant group Hamas, and training and equipping Shi'ite militants in Iraq - RFE/RL.org


U.S. Denounces Attack On RFE/RL Websites - State Department spokeswoman Jessica Simon said in an interview with RFE/RL that the attack was "another example of the assault against free and independent media in Belarus." RFE/RL.org


RFE/RL Websites Hit By Mass Cyberattack - Several websites run by RFE/RL's broadcast services have been hit by an unprecedented cyberattack, making them inaccessible to the outside world - "RFE/RL has taken countermeasures and restored full service to most of its Internet sites. The primary target, the Belarus Service, is still affected" RFE/RL.org


Former President Jimmy Carter To Meet With Terrorist Leader? Olmert to snub Carter over Hamas visit - “Israeli officials have expressed outrage at the possibility that he'll meet Mashaal. ... He's the leader of a terrorist organization.” WashingtonTimes.com


NATO Backs Washington's Missile Defense Plans: A Victory for U.S. Diplomacy - At their summit in Bucharest this week, NATO leaders endorsed U.S. plans for a missile defense system  to be based in Poland  and the Czech Republic. This represents a major success both for American diplomacy and the transatlantic alliance. Heritage.org


 

                The Real Prague Connection

 (The Evidence The MSM Doesn't Want You To Know)

                (click on thumbnail images to enlarge)       

 

  

                                     (See additional reporting, evidence and analysis below)

   

 Update 9/8/2006

U.S. Senate Committee on Intelligence

Links to Iraq Intelligence Phase II Report (link provided below)

Postwar Findings about Iraq's WMD Programs and Links to Terrorism and How they Compare with Prewar Assessments

First, my pictures are of a meeting which took place in the winter of 2000 and not of a April 9, 2001 alleged meeting between Atta and al Ani.  So no one should become confused with the dates.

According to the Senate Committee on Intelligence,  this is what al Ani told his FBI interrogators, but what he said and claims does not surprise me. Spies do cover their tracks, and al Ani would have covered his tracks after he learned that we were attempting to make a connection. As for the undated document recovered, that would be part of his cover, a planted document disavowing a meeting. No one should ever expect al Ani to tell anyone he met with lead hijacker Mohammed Atta in Prague "on any date" and incriminate himself.

  (click on thumbnail image to enlarge)   

Notice how the Senate Intelligence Committee does not acknowledge or report openly, on my pictures showing Atta meeting with al Ani during the winter of 2000.  Possibly, could it be that some former high level official dropped the ball on this one?

I bet al Ani was very surprised, especially after he saw surveillance photo's of himself and with Atta.

TW 9/8/2006

 

Update 9/10/2006

Vice President Cheney on Meet the Press with Tim Russert (link in red below)

MSNBC Meet the Press Transcript for 9/9/2006

Vice President Cheney today on Meet the Press confirmed the existence of my photo's. He also detailed that there have been several different reports of Atta in Prague.

Concerning my pictures, if I understand the Vice President correctly, he says the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. cannot verify that Atta was with al Ani in Prague . Well of course not. He was trained in the Afghanistan terrorist training camps to plan, work and travel undetected.

As I discussed before, Atta was using fake passports. The 9-11 commission confirmed in their report Atta was trained in altering passport identifications. You can also be sure he was trained in counter surveillance methods. After all, he was the al Qaeda operational commander and they were in the planning stages for 9-11 and would have wanted to go undetected so as not to compromise the operation.

I never published the large picture located above before April 4, 2006. I published a smaller and darker picture in October of 2002 to protect what I felt was vital intelligence and interest. In part of my  analysis, not disclosed until April 2006, the larger photo above shows moles located near the  right side of the eyebrow at exactly the same locations as on smaller photo's of Atta located above. 

If I can crack FSB/KGB intelligence operations with a high degree of accuracy, surely, with a 98% degree of confidence based on my photographic analysis, the man with al Ani in the large picture is 9-11 terrorist Mohammed Atta.

TW 9/10/2006

 

Update 9/12/2006

  ( X-Rayed)

On this additional part of my analysis I kept secret, you will see on the large photo located above that was taken in Prague, moles located just to the right side of the chin/lower jaw area also matches with the black and white photo of Atta.

TW 9/12/2006

Update 10/7/2006

The picture on the left hand side below, with the exception of what I have highlighted, is in its original form that was released by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) after the 9-11 attacks.

In the black and white photo's located above and below on the right hand side, you will notice the moles on the on the right side of Atta's face behind the chin area, are not seen as easily in the color picture released by FDOT.  The reason they were not seen in the photo released by FDOT, is because there has been an intentional attempt at covering up (photo shopped) the identifying markings and obscuring the unique shape and depth of his chin/jaw area.

I am not inclined to believe the camera for some reason, did not focus on that area correctly because the disturbance does not extend beyond Atta's facial outline and is limited only to the chin and jaw area..

I have ruled out that FDOT would allow touch-ups of a photo for a driver's license, and if Atta was using cosmetic make-up to cover up his markings, this would not cause a pixelation disturbance as the photo's clearly show.

The type of camera used, according to FDOT (confirmed), was a digital camera.

click on picture to enlarge   click on picture to enlarge

                                          Original Picture                                     Converted to Grayscale                                                                                                                      (xrayed)

TW 10/7/2006

added 7/30/2007: "The type of camera used, according to FDOT (confirmed), was a digital camera".

Update 4/07/2008

There have been numerous attempts to discredit the Atta meeting with Saddam’s intelligence official Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim al Ani in Prague of the Czech Republic. None of which were so blatantly obvious and I believe with possible malicious intent, than when the New York Times (using unnamed sources) attempted to discredit a meeting in Prague very early on in October of 2002.

The New York Times ran the article on October 21, 2002 stating as fact the President of the Czech Republic discretely called the White House and reported there was not any evidence a meeting occurred.

But the New York Times report was precisely and swiftly denied as a "fabrication".

The following report was published on 10/22/2002 (with full attribution) on the matter: CZECH REPUBLIC PRESIDENTIAL SPOKESMAN REJECTS 'NY TIMES' REPORT AS 'FABRICATION.' A spokesman for Czech President Vaclav Havel has dismissed a report in "The New York Times" claiming Havel told U.S. officials there is no evidence that suspected 11 September hijacker Mohammad Atta met an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague, CTK reported on 22 October. The 21 October report cited unidentified Czech officials as saying Havel discreetly called White House officials to cast doubt on the alleged meeting. "It is a fabrication. Nothing like this has occurred," Havel's spokesman, Ladislav Spacek, said of the alleged phone conversation". ("RFE/RL Newsline," 22 October)

Link to report: http://www.rferl.org/reports/mm/2002/10/41-251002.asp

"The photo's are supporting evidence". No amount of disinformation and or faulty reporting can change that.

The other covertly snapped photo (above) shows Saddam's intelligence official al Ani in a surveillance operation against an American interest. RFE/RL is an American interest.

Was the New York Times story an attempt to cover-up and poison potential evidence? It all depends, on who was feeding the disinformation to the New York Times. Was it a current Czech government official at the time? Or was it a former Czech government official at the time? Or was it someone with an axe to grind, and the New York Times just made it up, time will tell. One thing is for sure, their sourcing if any was full of it.

What is very interesting, is the fact I published the photo's for the first time on 10/22/2002, which coincides with the reporting..


 TW 4/7/2008


                                   The Litvinenko Assassination

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part I

Was the former KGB Lt. Colonel Alexander Litvinenko, a former spy and defector poisoned by the FSB? Logically, one would naturally connect the dots here and point to his previous employer that has a recorded history of poisoning to death their enemies, and clearly, Mr. Litvinenko was an enemy of the Russian state.

Naturally, the Russian foreign intelligence service known as the SVR would be the most likely leading candidate, motivationally speaking for the alleged attempted assassination. But if Vladimir Putin knew about and ordered the attempted assassination, would he risk an international incident by using a poisonous element called Thallium, which is a metal, that can be detected in the blood, and leave a trail of evidence related to the death, with its obvious tell-tale physically destructive affects on the human body. The short answer, its possible. Vladimir has made some mistakes, but I don't believe he would be this brazenly stupid.

Mr. Litvinenko, a former KGB officer who had turned author, was reportedly working on a project concerning the murder of another journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who was also famous for her critical reporting of Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Russian intelligence services and critical of “his” war in Chechnya.

What seems strange to me is how could a trained and experienced former spy and Lt. Colonel in the KGB let his guard down. By that I mean, accepting a drink without being wary of it, from whomever. Or maybe even, walking away from your drink or food to go to the bathroom, answer a phone call or become distracted by whatever.

Then on the other hand, perhaps he knew the would be assassin and trusted that person. Perhaps that person is a wannabe, or has been blackmailed or needs money. Hey, there is a lot of crack-pots and unbalanced individuals with monied motivations, or even for political reasons. Consider a sleeper or double agent. So there would be a lot of possibilities to work through.

Another part that strikes and stands out to me is that he states that he cannot remember the details of a first meeting he had on Nov. 1 in the AM with a stranger whom he reportedly never saw before and with a friend named Andrei Lugovoy, who is another former KGB spy. The reason it stands out to me is because that tells me that possibly something is running at peak performance at that point, because he can remember the details of the second meeting that he attended later on that day at another location, at the Japanese Sushi Bar, where proof of those involved in the murder of investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya was suppose to be revealed in documentation. That would be an indication  his memory is functioning just fine at that point, perhaps a little too fine.

Possibly, he consumed what is known as a cocktail, which is a mixture. Perhaps the cocktail contained something to make him feel euphoric, numbing and talkative, and then a second substance to wipe out his short-term memory, that could provide cover for whoever slipped him the near short term, fatal dose of Thallium or whatever.

Complicating matters, there is currently a reward said to be in the amount of around a million dollars for information leading to those responsible for Anna Politkovskaya's death. And along with potential book deals and speaking fees, that number could rise ten times. The sky would be the limit. That makes for a very profound motivation.

Anyone who works in the intelligence business, that had or has access to deep dark secrets has been trained to never let their guard down, anytime. It is something you have to learn to live with forever. It borders on the edge of paranoid insanity, but it is better to be alive than be dead.
 

TW 11/21/2006

correction: removed (exiled) from another exiled former kgb spy. (defective initial info.)

 

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part II

The poison now being reported that killed the exiled former KGB and FSB officer Aleksandr Litvinenko is Polonium 210. Initially, it was reported by doctors to be Thallium. But according to later urinalysis test revealed by The British Health Protection Agency (HPA) on 11/24 at a news conference, a large amount of Polonium 210 has been found in the Mr. Litvinenko’s urine.

Now we have a problem. If in fact Polonium 210 was used, as reported by the British Health Protection Agency “a large amount“, why did it take so long, three plus weeks to kill Litvinenko? And, where are the certified toxicology and lab reports at?

Polonium 210, is extremely hot (highly radioactive) and extremely toxic element. Even a milligram is extremely dangerous. If it was ingested in a large enough dose, as what should have been if it was the only poison used, Mr. Litvinenko should have been dead a lot sooner after ingestion, not the torturous 22 days he survived afterwards.

What I believe, and I stated this before, he was slipped a cocktail. What indicated to me that something else was at work was when he could not recall the details of the first meeting of the day. That meeting was with his long lost friend from Russia and ex KGB Andrei Lugovoy and another Russian or two around 10:00 AM, at the Millennium Mayfair Hotel, where witnesses saw him sipping tea. But strangely, he could remember the details of the second meeting at the Sushi Bar later on that day. This cocktail, possibly could have had a mixture of lethal poisons, along with a drug to make him talkative, feel euphoric, numb and cooperative (to find out what he knew). Then another for the short term chemical brainwash, which would provide cover for the assassin. Hence, not remembering the details was the clue. "I wonder if he reported having a headache shortly after the Nov. 1 meetings"?

Why would a cocktail of different poisons be used? Answer: To ensure the death of the person to be poisoned and for punishment (set an example). Because thallium for example, there is an antidote named Prussian Blue. But to distract, confuse and ensure, a second poisonous element could have been added, and since the radioactive element Thallium 210 has a very short half life, Polonium 210 would have been added because of its long half life and extreme toxicity properties. Making it a very deadly mixture.

Twenty percent (20%) of the Polonium 210 should have been retained (absorbed) and dispersed throughout the human body. The balance of 80% would have been discharged out of the body. So there should be plenty of evidence left in the corpse.

Polonium 210 is so toxic and highly radioactive, extreme care would have to be used while handling it. The poison would have to be encapsulated to protect the assassin from contamination while administering it in food or drink. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean that the person who handled the poison would not be contaminated.

I am now convinced that there is enough evidence to say that this was a professional hit on Mr. Litvinenko. Though I am not prepared to point at the exact affiliations, but it definitely points back to Russia.

Mr. Litvinenko survived some 22 days after being poisoned. So apparently, a large enough dose of the extremely toxic and highly radioactive poison did not get into his system immediately or was it intended to be that way. It could be that, he didn’t consume enough of the drink or food that was poisoned. It could also be that whoever mixed the poison, intended not to add enough of the Polonium to cause immediate death. But if someone wanted to shut him up quickly, that clearly failed.

TW 11/26/2006

 

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part III

As I analyzed and came to the conclusion long before anyone else, there is now proof that Aleksandr Litvinenko, as the evidence shows, was slipped a poison in a teacup at the Millenium Hotel bar while distracted. Most likely, by someone he knew and trusted.

There has not been any official toxicology report released yet. I’m sure they know the results by now, or at least a partial result. I’m waiting for a full report to be released.

There is a much bigger picture to all of this than just the Litvinenko assassination. As incredible as it sounds, is one that most folks would never imagine.

This whole sad series of recent events is nothing new. It is just another chapter in a long running operation. Russian intelligence has been operating like this for many years now. And, they have been getting away with it, and no one, practically, has been on to it. “They’ve gotten away with it so far, and they will continue until they are stopped”.

These are very dangerous times we have been living in over the past decade. Sadly, it isn’t only a “we versus them” plot. It involves nationalities and personalities spanning the globe.

Russia considered Litvinenko a danger to security, to the future of Putin’s planning and legacy. Litvinenko was a loose end to that planning. One with some semblance of credibility, former knowledge and ability to gain knowledge (information).

I thought, when the announced primary poison used was Polonium 210, there would be a good possibility, the assassins could be contaminated either through direct or cross-contamination, that left a “hot” trail to follow.

Polonium 210 spreads relatively easy. In the contamination case of Italian Mr. Scaramella, it was relatively easy to see how he was contaminated. I suspect, when Litvinenko and him were passing papers back and forth to each other at the Sushi bar, this is when the contamination occurred, however, there could have been other incidental contact involved at that meeting also.

To explain further, the polonium 210 radiation may not be able to pass through paper, but can be transmitted through contaminated contact, simply by the infected touching an object, and then someone else touching that contaminated object. If someone other than the primary target would be internally contaminated, going to their food, drink, eyes or mouth with their contaminated hands or object is all it would have taken.

Scotland Yard has had a difficult time attempting to interview Mr. Lugovoy in Russia. This is no accident. I suspect, the Russian’s are trying to work themselves into a more positive framework before allowing him to be interviewed. But the trail leading back to Lugovoy, has been so clear, there won’t be much of a chance to try and explain away anything.

I really believe, the planners and executioners of the plot believed they could get away with this type of poisoning, because the radiation was an alpha emitter, the type of radiation that would not be picked up through most scanning methods now in place, like at the airports etc..

Probably, Lugovoy has now become such an liability, perhaps he may be the next one to be eliminated. To cut the potential ties and reduce the signals pointing back at the SVR (Russian foreign Intelligence). This could possibly explain the conflicting reports concerning his health. Could be a precursor to future events.

Dimitry Kovtun, the other Russian who accompanied Lugovoy to the meeting at the Millenium Hotel Bar could have been involved,  as well as possibly a third Russian suppose to be present, or in the hotel when Litvinenko was poisoned.

There have been reports of radiation found at an apartment (flat) in Hamburg, Germany belonging to Mr Kovtun's former wife, Marina Wall, however, without the traces being found on the airline used by Kovtun to travel to Hamburg from Russia and then to London, makes this find very suspect. There also has been another report of another radiation find in Germany, this one belonging to the former mother in law of Kovtun. Again, without being able trace to an airline to or from in any direction, makes this information very suspect, even though still very possible. The mere trace (low level) of contamination indicates a possible incidental contact with radiation, and not proof of the source. Nothing has been ruled out.

Lugovoy has given differing accounts of events over the period since Litvinenko was pronounced poisoned with Polonium 210. One very important, was that supposedly he did not remember Litvinenko drinking anything at the meeting at the Millenium Hotel. But witnesses clearly remember seeing Litninenko sipping tea.

And another was when he gave a conflicting account to the Russian news service Kommersant. When he said the meeting at the Hotel took place in the PM, after the meeting as the Sushi Bar with the Italian Scaramella. That erroneous information was also published by a British tabloid where Lugovoy gave them an exclusive interview. Then was picked up by other news services and tabloids. Looks to me like a lame attempt at a Russian misinformation campaign.

In my opinion, it would seem to be almost virtually impossible for only one, either Lugovoy or Korvtun, who met with Litvinenko to be a lone conspirator involved with the poisoning during a short meeting on the morning of Nov. 1. The answer begets a question, how would you administer poison with one or two others watching? Or, the practicality of the possibility of someone else watching. Lugovoy has been the most heaviest contaminated individual, and his trails clearly show that. And it appears, judging from the evidence thus far, that he could possibly have been the one who administered the poisonous cocktail.

I’ve been warning and writing about these operations run against us for the last nine years. I’ve had my own numerous close calls and can speak from experience.

Some of Mr. Litvinenko last words were, "The bastards got me, they won't get us all'. He had that exactly right.

TW 12/10/2006

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part IV

Over the past couple of months, there have been a rash of speculative stories published in the press. Mostly coming from so called unnamed officials. But to keep the story going, a new twist is added just about every week.

On 1/21/07, the new story was a mysterious unnamed Russian, who made the tea and poisoned Litvinenko in a room of the Millenium Hotel.  Here is the link to an AP story on Foxnews.com.

Then on 1/22/2004, The BBC interviewed Litvinenko's wife Marina. She said that Sasha told her that: "At the Millennium Hotel, Sasha (Mr. Litvinenko) told me he met Lugovoi and during this meeting he had drunk tea.
"He said it was tea already served, on the table, and he just took this cup of tea, and he didn't finish it at all, and how he later said tea wasn't very tasty, 'because it was cold'." The link to the interview: BBC.co.uk.               

Now, on 1/26/2007 an unnamed senior British source claims they found a teapot that supposedly was used which held the poisoned tea. Link to that report: ABCNEWS.com. But in the interview between the BBC and Marina Litvinenko, she stated that Sasha Litvinenko told her the tea was already served and on the table and he just took this cup of tea, and he didn't finish it at all". There was no mention of a teapot. Mr. Litvinenko drank tea from a teacup, not from a teapot, it was the poison in the cup that that presumably killed him. The interview between the BBC.co.uk. and Mr. Litvinenko's wife contradicts the ABCNEWS.com. account.

The Pine Bar opens at 9:00 AM as per their schedule. If there was a contaminated teapot involved, anything in it would have remained hot between the time period 9:00 & 10:00 AM. It would make no sense to poison the entire contents of a teapot prior to the 10:00 AM meeting, and then only to have a poisoned cup already poured and waiting for him to drink. Obviously, it only took a swallow or two to prove to be fatal.

Assuming there was a teapot on the table, It would have been a lot more effective to let Litvinenko pour his own poisoned tea, or for someone to pour from the teapot in front of him, which then would have been hot and chances are, he would have drank all of it consuming a higher concentration of the poison. Another question would be, why didn't he pour himself a fresh cup from the alleged teapot when he discovered his tea was cold? Quite possibly, there wasn't any.

Another possibility would have been when the staff cleaned up the table, if there was a teapot on the table or on a cart etc., to pour the majority left in the cup that Litvinenko did not drink back into the teapot to transport the cup back to the kitchen for washing. Perhaps that is how the teapot, if there was one anywhere near, could have been contaminated. 

Then, according to another report way back on 12/9/2006 by the Daily Mirror of the U.K., Scotland Yard detectives  quarantined cups and saucers which showed signs of being contaminated. The reports also states seven of the bar staff who clean up the tables or handled the crockery were contaminated.

The same report by the Daily Mirror quoted a senior counterterrorism source, "We think the cup contaminated all the other crockery that was placed in the same dishwasher".  In my opinion, this would have in my estimation, produced a near consistent readout for trace elements throughout all of the crockery in the dishwasher, because it was all washed together. The polonium 210 would not penetrate or stick to any hardened glazed surface after repeated washings in any appreciable concentrations, unless the glazing was crazed, but unlikely in a commercial environment for sanitary reasons.. Here is the link to that report: Mirror.co.uk

I'm sticking with the single poisoned cup theory. I trust the testimony of Mrs. Litvinenko before any unnamed source and news service puffing the importance of the report. It was the poison in the teacup, not an alleged teapot that killed Mr. Litvinenko.

I wonder what it is going to be next week, in a contaminated sugar bowl or other container maybe used for creamer? No wonder Lugovoi is laughing and the Russian Prosecutor won't cooperate.

The Mayfair Millennium Hotel in London on Jan. 26,2007 released a statement to counter the speculative reporting. The X Report.com was offered and accepted the following statement from the Millennium Hotel in London.

(click on thumbnail image to enlarge)

TW 1/28/2007

Update 1/29/2007

I've been made aware the  ABCNEWS.com.  so-called exclusive noted above is a planted disinformation story by a Russian named Oleg Gordievsky. The story is based on his own personal view and not that of Scotland Yard. Gordievsky is the same source for the "mysterious Russian" story noted above as an AP article on Foxnews.com. This originated from a TimesOnline.co.uk piece. Both stories and their sources have been discredited. Gordievsky is wasting everyone's time. I'm surprised they allow him to do that.

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part V

As I analyzed and stated before starting on 11/21/2006 in part 1, 2 and 3 of this series, the poison that murdered Mr. Litvinenko was in a teacup he drank from. A person would be hard pressed to find anyone else that figured that out right away and be able to prove it.

Well it didn't take too very long and we now have another report. This time, the report comes from the U.K. internet news service, This is London.co.uk (link) a.k.a The Evening Standard. The report claims the waiter who serviced the Litvinenko table at the Millennium Pine Bar in London is Noberto Andrade, 67 and says doctors only give him five or six years to live because he has been fatally contaminated with the poison.

The report makes no mention of any particulars or specifics other than he served the table with green tea in a pot. So I left a comment on the story page. Whether or not they will publish the comment remains to be seen. I also sent the editor an email to let him know. I will post the exact comment here I left on their website:

"Mrs. Litvinenko gave the BBC an interview on Jan. 22. Mr. Litvinenko told her the tea was already served and on the table and he just took this cup of tea, and he didn't finish it at all, and how he later said tea wasn't very tasty, 'because it was cold'. She did not mention he said anything about a teapot. Who purchased the tea, Lugovoi? Did the server pour the tea into the cup? Who was seated at the table when he served the tea? Did he leave the teapot on the table? Did he pour the remainder of the tea Mr. Litvinenko didn't drink back into the pot? How did he transport the crockery back to the kitchen or bar area, on a tray or cart? What type of ceramics was the cup and pot made from? Was it a smooth glazed material on the inside? Was the pot washed in the same dishwasher at the same time as the teacup and saucer? Did the teapot have a lid on it? Was the teapot insulated? What time did he serve the tea? Seems this report raises many questions that need to be answered before any determination can be made as to whether the teapot was directly poisoned or the poison was placed directly into the teacup before the arrival of Mr. Litvinenko." (Posted to their website @ 11:39 AM EST on 1/29/2007)

It would also be interesting to know how this unfortunate gentleman came to be so heavily contaminated with the polonium 210. Because he wasn't only externally contaminated, but somehow managed to ingest the contaminated tea, or it entered through a wound, or came into contact with his eyes etc..

Again, the report is very short and vague with statements like, " It is thought the assassin slipped a capsule of the polonium 210 into the tea while seated at the table"  and in reference to the teacup and pot "Both items have since been seized by police". But it is well known, the police have seized a lot more than just that.

So we will see if this is an accurate report or another load of crap. Keep a watch!

Link to report: This is London.co.uk (link)

Update 1/29/2007

Something is already fishy. The British tabloid The Sun.co.uk (link) is where this report may have originated from.  The report is not exactly word for word,  but is just as short and vague and lacks specifics. Some sentences are exactly the same where others have different words used in the same sentences. There are a few different sentences altogether. I've tried to contact the writer Virginia Wheeler for some clarifications. I won't be holding my breath.

The report in "This is London.com" is probably a recycled version from some hours earlier in The Sun.co.uk.

TW 1/29/2007

Update 2/1/2007

In a email exchange with Virginia Wheeler, she confirmed the This is London.co.uk (link) article was a recycled version. She avoided answering any of the questions I asked citing being able to use only "cursory details " because it is a sensitive police investigation. But that has never stopped "The Sun" from publishing details of the investigation before for legal reasons.

Here is a good example. In a piece published by The Sun titled: "Italian is 'well' after tests" (link), it goes on to state five paragraphs into the article "Detectives are convinced Mr. Scaramella was “nuked” as he breathed in particles coming from the former Russian spy’s food at their sushi bar meeting".

That report has proven to be totally untrue. Mr. Litvinenko was poisoned at the Millennium Pine Bar, not at the Sushi Bar and Mr. Scaramella, has not been internally contaminated (poisoned) with Polonium 210.

There are many other inaccuracies in the same story too. Just read the last five paragraphs. I'm not going to waste any more time on it. I've saved a screen shot of the story in the event they try and cover it up. This story was written by their crime editor, M. Sullivan.

TW 2/1/2007

Update 3/2/2007

As I suspected, there was not any person, other than Litvinenko who was fatally poisoned by the polonium 210. Nor was there any other person who has been identified as having been presently sickened or identified as having been adversely affected in the long term from trace level exposure to the Polonium 210. The U.K. Health Protection Agency on March 1, 2007 released its latest press statement.

There were a total of 700 people tested for exposure to the Polonium 210. Of those 700 tested, 581 of them have been ruled out as having been exposed to any level of contamination.

The health protection agency released the following report:

Category 1
  • 581 people had results ‘below reporting level' - below 30 millibecquerels (mBq) per day (natural levels of Po-210 in urine are typically in the range 5-15 mBq per day). It is therefore unlikely that any of these people had been exposed to Po-210
Category 2
  • 85 people had results above 30 mBq per day in their urine, but with a dose less than 1mSv indicating no public health risk, and no health concern to the individual, but probable contact with Po-210
Category 3a
  • 34 people had results above 1 millisievert (mSv), but below 6mSv indicating no public health risk, and no health concern to the individual, but probable contact with Po-210
Category 3b
  • 16 people had results above 6mSv which are not significant enough to cause any illness in the short term and any increased risk in the long term is likely to be very small

source: U.K. Health Protection Agency (link to press statement)

TW 3/2/2007

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part VI

Paul Joyal Assasination Attempt

Some Notes On How KGB Or Other Political Interest Assassinate

Is it a mere strange coincidence, that four days after an airing on Dateline about the Litvinenko murder that a Washington DC based consultant who was interviewed on the show regarding Russian security services is shot on his driveway?

According to a media report by the (International Herald Tribune - Kremlin critic shot in front of his Maryland home - link), an anonymous federal law enforcement official was quoted as saying " the federal authorities were leaning towards the view that Joyal was the victim of a street crime unrelated to his opinions related to Russia".

I would say to that statements, not so fast. That is exactly how these foreign intelligence services or other interest operate. Preferably, assassins would make it look like an accident or use other methods, with no tracks left in the snow to follow.

Try this on for example. It was real easy to find Mr. Joyal’s address, age, telephone number and a map showing where he lived employing a simple search on the internet.

Now that it has been established how easy that was, lets examine how an assassin would want to operate. Again they want to make it look like an accident or use another plausible reason for a motive, other than the obvious. They would exploit any potential weakness a target may have. Even search for your medical records, if they could get their hands on them to see if you have any exploitable weaknesses.

There would be a multitude of possible scenario’s. I’m going to pick one out here. One that seems to be a possibility based on the available public information released thus far.

In this instance, for the sake of argument, lets call Mr. Joyal a target. They would look for a weakness in his lifestyle or whatever would make for a perfect murder. In this case, the most obvious would be his proximity to a high crime area.

Lets say the Russian mafia was called upon (and they do operate here in the U.S.) by the Russian FSB or former KGB operatives or other interest. They would request a hit on someone and want to make it look like random crime. So they hire hit men, maybe they are crack or other type of junkies and were promised drugs and or cash.

According to press reports, Mr. Joyal was shot in the pelvic region. It would be not be very hard to explain away how he could have been hit there. I know if someone pulls out a gun on me, I would only need to see the movement and one could color me gone. That may very well explain why he was shot in that location. On the other hand, it’s a possibility to think maybe it was intentional and was to serve a warning. I don’t know the exact facts on the matter making it hard to make an exact determination.

This can’t be so easily dismissed as a random crime.

I definitely would have questions on all of this. A very serious first question I would have, is why would an expert on Russian KGB intelligence be so easy to find? Would you not care about your own welfare and that of your family (if a person had one) when dealing with these sensitive subjects?

Now I’m going to tell you what I really believe. I believe there are a lot of experts and some politicians and so forth that are in way over their heads on these matters (that only adds to the confusion). And the media, they also have a responsibility not to put peoples lives in jeopardy.

This is definitely one that is going to be hard to prove one way or another unless the shooters are apprehended alive, if they still are.

And if you work in these fields and talk openly or write about these subjects, better get your home addresses off the internet and start imposing security methods on oneself, as uncomfortable as it may be.

TW 3/4/2007

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part VII

Joyal Shooting

I usually don’t jump on stories like this at such an early stage. But this one stood right out.

There have been numerous conflicting reports coming from the media concerning the facts surrounding the shooting. Some of the initial reporting suggested Mr. Joyal’s wallet and briefcase were missing, leading many to believe this was a botched robbery.

I never weighed those misreported facts in.

The newest report comes from NBC4.com/news in Adelphi, Maryland. Their information suggest it may have been a carjacking. However, that also corroborates that the area is in close proximity to, if not an area where crime occurs. That makes it for a perfect backdrop. Motor vehicle theft for Hyattsville, Maryland, which is less than five miles to the south from where Mr. Joyal lives, was almost two times more than the national average. This average was based on the 2005 FBI crime reports.  (link: see 2005 Hyattsville FBI crime report) 

Now we have not only shown how easy it was to find Paul Joyal on the internet, there is now proof that the area he lives in can be subjected to crime. This could lay the foundation for an attempted hit or warning.

Most of the facts are somewhat sketchy coming from news sources with varying degrees of connections relative to the true facts.

I’m going to take NBC4 at their word for some of the facts they reported on. According to their sources, Mr. Joyal was followed home by the assailants.

Additional reporting by the source indicate there were more than one assailant, as was earlier reported. The reporting also goes on to say that there was a getaway car involved.

The reporting goes on to state there was a struggle with Mr. Joyal and one of the assailants. The report also goes on to conclude that it was a carjacking gone bad.

But that point, assuming a carjacking went bad cannot be solidified with the facts. It just doesn’t square. If it was a carjacking only, then after shooting Mr. Joyal, why did not the assailants just take the car and leave? You had a wounded man probably just laying there incapacitated. They went so far, why not go the rest of the way?

Obviously there was a firearm used. When a carjacker uses a firearm during a (carjacking), they are prepared to use whatever means needed to achieve their objective. But they left the car.

In another report, by the AP via The International Herald Tribune updated version, Mrs. Joyal was interviewed and wanted to straighten out some of the facts. She was adamant her husband was not robbed and the briefcase and his wallet were located.

She stated when interviewed on Monday, "We really have no idea what the reason was," said Elizabeth Joyal, but she added that "it could easily have been a random act of violence."

If the reporting from various news sources are accurate, Mr. Joyal was followed from the International Spy Museum in Washington DC and being followed from there for a distance of (19) nineteen miles or about slightly more than a half an hour drive at the very least, but it may have taken a little longer, depending on traffic and the exact route taken.

The hours at the museum were from 10:00Am till 6:00PM on March the first, the day he was shot.

So we have assailants that staked out Mr. Joyal’s car in Washington DC, at the International Spy Museum, in a area being only six (6) short blocks from the White House . The assailants followed an adult male after a meeting with a former KGB spy at a spy museum and leaving probably during the latter part of peak traffic hours and maybe even later. There are some time line discrepancies.

Mr. Joyal, 54 years of age, not appearing debilitated, in a nice car, traveled for over a half an hour to his home. And then when the assailants pulled up behind him at Mr. Joyal’s driveway, one of the assailants gets out of the getaway car, and supposedly attempts to steal the car at gunpoint. Mr. Joyal puts up a struggle, the assailant shoots him as told to by the assailant driving the getaway car, (just shoot him was heard by a witness?) and then leaves in the getaway car after driving quite a distance without stealing the car and after rendering the subject incapacitated .

In my opinion, very possibly, this was an assassination attempt set up to appear as a carjacking, which did not go according to plan after Mr. Joyal surprised the assailants when he struggled and at the same time quite possibly, interrupted by another witness who was close enough to hear the assailant in the getaway car shout, “just shoot him“. Or they would have finished their job one way or another. Not being trained international assassins, they panicked when disrupted. If they really wanted that car, after all that, they could have taken it. Another five or ten seconds would not have mattered. It seemed to be more important to just shoot him and leave the car.
 

TW 3/5/2007

added information on 3/7/2007- "Motor vehicle theft for Hyattsville, Maryland, which is less than five miles to the south from where Mr. Joyal lives, was almost two times more than the national average. This average was based on the 2005 FBI crime reports.  (link: see 2005 Hyattsville FBI crime report)"  (initial research added to paragraph #4 for proof) (Mr. Joyal has two public home address listings on the net that use the same street name and address. One is listed as Hyattsville Md., and the other Adelphi, Md.) (Both maps point to the exact same street address)

TW 3/7/2007

Spies and Former Spies Beware


Part VIII


I’ve waited to see how things were going to pan out in the case of Alexander Litvinenko and Paul Joyal, the American from Maryland who believes his shooting was a professional hit, which I believe was connected to the Litvinenko case.

It now definitely appears that the Litvinenko case is going nowhere. The Russian’s have the Brit’s by the gonads over energy supplies, Tony Blair has high-tailed it, the Bush administration has taken a in public neutral position on the case and Russia officially refuses to extradite Andrei Lugovoi. No surprise there.

Lugovoi won’t allow himself to be tried in Britain and wisely so on his part. If he was truly innocent and not connected to the KGB/FSB, he would willingly travel to the U.K and defend himself. Lugovoi has the financial means to defend himself and Britain does not have a death penalty.

The director of public prosecutions for the U.K., Sir Ken McDonald concluded the evidence was strong enough to charge and extradite Russian Andrei Lugovoi. I don’t believe the U.K. prosecutorial service will allow the Russian prosecutors have the evidence and put on a for show only circus trial in Russia or compromise the evidence.

Perhaps at least, the KGB/FSB is put on notice they cannot get away with continued international assassinations as easily as before (at least for the interim). Maybe they will again have to get a little more creative. Make something look as though it is an accident or crime. That is how its done folks. You just never know.

Mrs. Litvinenko and Mr. Goldfarb, Mr. Litvinenko’s friend are busy out selling books, and attending film festivals. Mrs. Litvinenko was interviewed by the Charlie Rose show recently and spoke of the timeline the day the Mr. Litvinenko was poisoned, which was flawed. Mr. Goldfarb is pushing his own uncorroborated version (theory) of the events (not publicly backed up by Scotland Yard).

While this may not have been be helpful to the case, perhaps they did not really expect the case to go anywhere under the circumstances, so why not go out and make as much money as you can and keep it in the limelight at the same time. Personally, I find the former somewhat unhelpful and questionable, but it wasn‘t my spouse.

This was an act of nuclear terrorism, because it involved and affected so many innocent people which could have been catastrophic. Amazingly and fortunately, no one else other than Litvinenko has been killed thus far by the incident.

So the Litvinenko case, barring any unforeseen slip-ups by Moscow or Lugovoi, will never be resolved.

TW 7/5/2007

Spies and Former Spies Beware

Part IX

In retaliation for the Russian government refusal to extradite Andrei Lugovoi, the Brits have expelled four Russian diplomats and the Russian government in turn expelled four British diplomats.

Vladimir Putin and the Russian government are now attempting to downplay the significance of the expulsions of the diplomats, but that is an old KGB trick, to get you to let your guard down while they secretly and quietly turn up the heat.

Putin has ordered his air force to harass the Brits by attempting to enter their airspace. This is reminiscent of cold war tactics. The object is to harass and test the capabilities of the Brits. This could very well continue into the future if the Brits don‘t back-off the demand for the extradition of Andrei Lugovoi .

There have been press reports, there may have been an assassination attempt against Boris Berezovsky’s life and the perpetrator has been deported. But I question the lack of facts and evidence about this and because there are a lot of shady players involved. If there was a murder plot against Mr. Berezovsky, the British government would not have deported a murder suspect back to Russia. They would have detained him and sent him to trial, especially after the Litvinenko assassination. Obviously, there is not any evidence and the talk is nothing but unsubstantiated conjecture. Possibly, a political stunt.

The news about Paul Joyal has been very quiet as of late. Other than Mr. Joyal stating he believes he was targeted for assassination, there has been limited information forthcoming.

Another reason that I discount the motive to be a random street crime in the Joyal case is due to the simple reason that the persons involved, would not have been hiding there for any length of time. No one, will hide in bushes, adjacent to homes, for a period of time, in broad daylight, and then waiting until just about dusk, to commit a random crime, it is way too risky. The perpetrators would have had to know somehow when Mr. Joyal was to arrive at home if he was not followed.

So the questions still remain, did they stake him out and follow him home or were they tipped off about his travels about when and where. Specifically when he left the International spy museum in D.C. and headed directly to his residence. There possibly appears to be some deception regarding the reported timeline - at least to the press. Either way, seemingly, they most certainly would have known Mr. Joyal was at the International Spy Museum in D.C. and when he left to arrive home..

Mr. Joyal was to meet his appointment at or very near closing time on that day. Obviously, Mr. Joyal spent some time with the former KGB agent and after closing time of the Museum. Perhaps, they were spending some time in one of the conference rooms of the International Spy Museum.

Andrei Lugovoi has been very talkative as of late, still claiming his innocence. He refuses to be tried by any third party country or in the U.K... I also don’t believe the Brits would try the case outside of the U.K. because the terrorist act occurred in the U.K and as well as for other reasons..

Mr. Lugovoi appears be very worried that if he would travel outside of Russia, he would be snatched up in some operation and hauled back to Britain. Lugovoi has recently stated he will not leave the borders of Russia and that he is very content to stay within, however, I would not put it past Lugovoi to travel incognito. At some point, he will probably try it. He has business interest outside of Russia and he has a very daring type of personality.

I have been thinking, and I’ve been told that when I do that, things can get dangerous. But anyhow, I wonder if the Brits are having any second thoughts about the way political dissidents (former KGB agents) have been allowed to collaborate so openly and freely. Hence, I mean, I would think this could eventually, lead up to serious national security problems. Take Berezovsky for instance, not that long ago, he called for the overthrow of the Putin regime from the safety and the confines of another country, and he has many contacts and supporters in Russia with which to utilize.. Eventually, this type of across border political activity will have a negative impact on the host country, in this case, it is the United Kingdom.

I watched other exiles (& former KGB agent) which now live in the U.K. promote disinformation regarding the Litvinenko case, and the media sucks it up and runs with it as though it is the truth. It was not helping with the Litvinenko case and causes confusion while possibly discrediting the known facts.. So why would they do it? You tell me…

I recall during either December of 1999 or Jan. of 2000 I was attending an auction in Hershey, Pa.. Now to put this in a little bit of perspective, prior to that, I had wrote a couple of articles about someone selling (large volumes) the Russians some of our high tech (classified) military gear. Not to mention, I was on to Putin right from the get-go, realizing that a KGB agent taking over as president of Russia, I just knew there was going to be trouble and wrote about that too and, helped to neutralize a Russian intelligence operation successfully.

Anyhow, this person walks up to me, taller than I and starts talking about politics and then on to about the Clinton’s marital relations while living in the White House together. He said to me they were just animals, he used the word vicious more than once to describe them. He stated that how they were warring with each other and when they were in the White House together, they would be at opposite ends of the White House just to avoid each other.

Now, I thought to myself, I wonder who this guy is and what he wants to know. He appeared and sounded to be American. Said he lived in the D.C. area and I thought to myself, oh boy. So I told him I did a little writing, and the subject matter we talked about was the Russians. His ears perked up and eyes bugged. I suppose he thought he would trade a little information with me. To sum it up, I did not tell him anything that I did not write about previously.

He wanted to know how I did my work and who was telling me this information, I just told him point blank, I can’t tell him that ( I protect my methodology)… He just shook his head in an up and down manner indicating he understood, and I remember, he appeared to stiffen up and his eyes opened up a little wider. He never identified himself, I never asked, and maybe all for the better. I kind of thought to myself he was probably FBI, but had no idea he was a traitor named Robert Hanssen. I never knew that before, until I saw his picture after he was arrested in 2001, and put together the events before and after this.

“I don’t believe Hanssen was acting alone“. Not too long after the auction, there was an incident. There has been more than one incident, but I will just discuss this one for now.

Without going into detail, I will explain it this way for security reasons. The location where I was working caused me to travel every day across a bridge spanning a river. It is a highway, where the speeds usually ran around 65 mph and sometimes faster, sometimes slower. I had developed a pattern where I traveled across this river at near a certain time each day. Not really paying attention to all vehicles around me at all times (but I do now) I remember a van speeding beside me (left side) on the multiple lane highway and cutting over in front of me. There was not too much distance in front of me. The next thing I knew was there was a steel ramp thrown out of the van right in front of me. Not having more than a split second to react, instinctively, I turned hard to the right, I could feel the pick up truck go on two wheels heading in the direction of the lane to the right of me, then in the next instance (split second), I had to cut the wheels hard back to the left, again to avoid crashing into and or going over the edge of the bridge..

I never got a plate number. No time for that. After some of the shock wore off, and about possibly a mile later or so, an older four door vehicle drove past me at a higher rate of speed. A sign was flashed from the rear window as the car went speeding past with someone holding what appeared a hastily made sign from a piece of cardboard with lettering, probably scribbled with a magic marker with the word “AGILE” pressed up against the rear window. Those guys looked really rough from the brief glimpse I got and there were at least two in the vehicle..

When I think about what would have happened had I hit the ramp with either wheel or both, chances are that I would have flipped and maybe crashed or rolled and possibly into the side of the bridge or went over it. I then realized, I definitely touched a nerve or two somewhere, that was obvious. This was very professional.

At that point, all kinds of thoughts start flashing through your mind. I was questioning whether this was related to me neutralizing Russian intelligence operations, was this Clinton’s hit men, after all, there were stories all over the place of the Clinton’s having people snuffed out ranging from cocaine deals to political hits.. Everything ran the full gambit.

This was one of those times when it felt like the universe shown directly down on you and said, ok Ted, its your time to shine, don’t screw it up.

I thought, holy smokes, who do you trust, my conclusion: no one. There are spies everywhere operating in the U.S., a K.G.B. agent and current head of the FSB (formerly KGB) is named by Boris Yeltsin to be the Russian Vice Prime Minister and later that very same day, Putin is elevated to the position of Russian Prime Minister. Then seemingly right away (7 weeks later), the Russians invade Chechnya and only a week into the conflict (ground assault), Putin signs an order to begin oil and natural gas extraction, the Russians are inciting the Muslims through Intel operations, the Russians are kidnapping journalist, the Clinton administration and the C.I.A. seems oblivious to all of the operations being run against us, someone was selling the Russians large quantities of high tech equipment (classified) and using them against us, the Clintons are attending parties where they are collaborating with Chinese agents trying to steal our technologies, I’m cracking Russian Intel operations, someone is trying to take me out. I thought man, we have problems, I need to stay alive and do what I do best.
I was only a nobody, what can I do. Thank God a presidential election was coming up. We needed a change and it could not come fast enough. That is why I worked so hard to get Bush elected. I knew we were in big trouble and it seemed like he was the right guy for the job..

I thought for sure, the C.I.A. and the former administration would brief the new Bush administration on what the threats were to the U.S.. It seemed to start off right, the FBI nailed the traitor Hannsen. But that was not to be.

I was in complete shock when President Bush looked Putin in the eye and said he saw his soul. Thinking, oh my god, he either has not been informed by the C.I.A. or the former Clinton administration during the transition on the urgent threats or the totality of them all, or he is trying to use psychology against a decorated KGB agent. This did not set well with me.

Suppose now, know why I was so fired up. How could anyone go about their business? Everything was not business as usual, that is why. There were reasons for all of the activity directed at the U.S.. It seemed like no one was connecting the dots but me, chided for being a cold war stereotype, a Russophobe, stuck in the mindset of the cold war, chide all you want, I nailed it right from the get-go..

Contrary to Democrat popular opinion and some Republicans, I am proud I have helped to get President Bush elected the first time, re-elected for a second term and that he is our President.. None of us all of the time may agree on domestic policies for a variety of different reasons, but most importantly, I view domestic and foreign policy matters from the standpoint of holding together a coalition of allies, both here in the U.S. and abroad, that is how we win wars more easily, by keeping the people close to us through our actions. Simply put, take care of the people, and they will take care of you.

I don’t believe the President got the full story from day one, and still don’t believe he has. Maybe the evidence does not exist anymore. Thanks to Sandy Berger and others.

So for the future, I believe the Brits as well as the U.S., will have to watch the gates a little more closely. I believe it will be imperative that all known and suspected Russian intelligence service personnel be denied entry or tracked and monitored very, very closely. If we don’t, we will be just asking for more trouble.

In the meantime, all of the smoke and mirrors along with the bursts of hot air does nothing to resolve the Litvinenko murder. The British government has done about as much as they can without starting a shooting war with the Russians.

Continued worldwide condemnation and pressure on Vladimir Putin will eventually have an impact. But I don’t believe he will ever give up Lugovoi, at least alive. Putin is way too smart for that. I wouldn’t put anything past him.

TW 08/07/2007

correction added - Inserted "Putin becomes Prime Minister" instead of President.

I am going to save the rest for my book sometime. A no B.S. assessment of the events and accounts of America at Risk.                                                               

All Rights Reserved 2007
 


 

Related Links

  •  KGB 'tried to poison man' in sushi bar - Scotland Yard is investigating the attempted murder of a top Russian defector - DailyMail.co.uk 11/21/2006
  •  British Police Investigating Litvinenko Poisoning Case - The Litvinenko poisoning is reminiscent of past Soviet-style skullduggery - RFE/RL.org  11/21/2006
  •  The bastards got me, they won't get us all'
    Poisoned spy defiant in final interview before his death - TimesOnline.Co.UK 11/24/2006
  •  Radiation Link In Spy Death - RFE/RL.org 11/24/2006
  •  Who killed Litvinenko? The first meeting, at 10am, was at the Millennium Mayfair Hotel in central London with Sergei Lugovoy, a former KGB bodyguard and businessman who runs a security company in Moscow  - Friends of Mr Litvinenko insist that he drank tea during the meeting. TheIndependent.co.uk 11/25/2006
  •  British Authorities May Test Litvinenko Contacts - authorities say they may seek to carry out health tests on customers at a restaurant and hotel - RFE/RL.org 11/26/2006
  •  NO IMMUNITY - Blair warning to Russians - 10am arrived at Mayfair hotel - 3pm he went to Itsu restaurant - 6pm went to Grosvenor address - Mirror.co.uk 11/29/2006
  •  Radiation is detected on BA flights to Moscow -
    traces of radiation on two of its three aircraft that have flown to Moscow - TimesOnline.co.uk  11/30/2006
  •  Flights take poison trail to Moscow - The finger of suspicion over the Alexander Litvinenko poisoning was pointing at Moscow last night - Telegraph.co.uk 11/30/2006
  •  "It was reported that the levels of radiation were highest in the toilets of the Millennium Hotel in London, where Mr.  Litvinenko had a meeting shortly before falling ill" - Guardian.co.uk  12/1/2006
  •  Litvinenko informant contaminated -  TimesOnline.co.uk 12/1/2006  Cross Contamination?
  •  Contact & Wife positive for polonium test - Mr Scaramella is not thought to be suffering physical symptoms - BBC.co.uk  12/1/2006
  •  "traces so strong in a room of Millenium Hotel,  indicates the actual source of the radiation was present" Telegraph.co.uk 12/2/2006
  •  X KGB Sergei Lugovoy, from Russia is contaminated with Polonium 210 - TimesOnline.co.uk 12/2/2006
  •  Revealed: Litvinenko's Russian 'blackmail plot' - Guardian.co.uk
  •  Traces of spy poison found in cup at Millenium Hotel - Telegraph.co.uk 12/9/2006
  •  Russia to blame, says Litvinenko widow - Observer-Guardian.co.uk 12/10/2006
  •  POISONED SPY: IT WAS IN HIS TEA - was poisoned by having polonium 210 slipped into his drink at the hotel, probably while distracted by a phone call or other interruption - Mirror.co.uk
  •  THE BUS TICKET THAT PROVES WHERE SPY WAS POISONED - LETHAL DOSE GIVEN AT HOTEL -  Mirror.co.uk
  •  WE KNOW KGB SPY POISONER -  British detectives are certain they know who murdered former Soviet spy Alexander Litvinenko with radioactive poison. - Mirror.co.uk  1/8/2007
  •  Russian tycoon Berezovsky says Litvenenko named Lugovoy - says he never talked to Scotland Yard about it.  Reuters.com
  •  Berezovsky Breaks Silence On Litvinenko - Litvinenko: Boris, I won't say publicly, but I believe Lugovoy, Kovtun and another person poisoned me. RFE/RL.org
  •  Open Season On Journalist - Another Disliked Russian Reporter Dies Suspiciously In Russia After Falling Five Stories - TV3.co.nz
  •  Number of spies in UK returns to cold war levels - Counter intelligence officers say there are now 30 agents operating out of the Russian Embassy and trade mission - Guardian.co.uk
  •  Russian Intelligence Expert Calls Attack Assassination Attempt
    Mr. Paul Joyal believes the attack on him was more than just a local crime - NBC4.com  (Again, The X Report gathers, analyzes and gets it right. Read Part VI and VII of Spies and Former Spies Beware)
  •   U.K. Crown Prosecution Service Director of Public Prosecutions Sir Ken Macdonald :  "I have today concluded that the evidence sent to us by the police is sufficient to charge Andrei Lugovoi with the murder of Mr Litvinenko by deliberate poisoning. - BBC.co.uk (Once Again, The X Report Gathers, Analyzes And Nails It! Light Years Ahead Of The Rest.)
  • Russia Refuses British Extradition Request in Poisoned Spy Case - Russian prosecutors have officially rejected Britain's request for the extradition of Andrei Lugovoi - VoiceOfAmerica.com
Saddam’s Incomplete Archives

The much anticipated (entire) report on the captured remnants of Saddam’s regime archives will not be published on the internet. Reportedly, the reason is the report is too politically sensitive, however that would not be the only reason (s).

The most sensitive (top secret) archived information was destroyed in a "selective deliberate fashion" by Saddam’s IIS (Iraqi Intelligence Service), and I believe there are indications this was accomplished under the direction of Russian intelligence.

There is no way any report could reach any final conclusions with regard to any ties with al Qaeda based on partial and incomplete array of captured archived documents (the ones deemed unimportant - not destroyed). I don’t believe the report states any such conclusion, but makes clear based on their available information, they could not find a smoking gun in the left-over archives.

Obviously, the pictures of the deliberately and selectively destroyed files and computer hard drives (see below) describe a different picture than which the leaked media reports suggest. None of the earliest media reports mention any of the deliberately destroyed and missing archives as a factor in making a determination, but rather pointedly proclaim there was not any Iraq - al Qaeda connection. A proclamation which is profoundly misleading and wrong.

The Institute for Defense Analyses attempted to put together a picture from a jigsaw puzzle with the most important pieces missing. Drawing any definitive conclusions based on partial and missing information can be daunting task, but can if properly evaluated lead to accurately educated directions. One such direction is clearly stated in the report, Saddam relied on state sponsorship of terrorism as a tool against non-Iraqi’s, which would undoubtedly include America (an enemy).

Any evidence that would tie al Qaeda and Iraq to joint terrorist activities and state sponsored support post 9-11 would have been a priority for destruction (top secret activities). The reasons, war crimes, crimes against humanity, ties to other countries, ties to 9-11, etc..

Supporting evidence of Saddam’s intelligence services (IIS) in action against American interest exist right here on this website. I have photo’s for supporting evidence, what do the Iraq war opponents have?

 (click on picture to enlarge thumbnail)

Courtesy: CIA - Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The basement historical files were systematically selected and destroyed.

(click on picture to enlarge thumbnail)

Courtesy: CIA - Storage room in basement of Revolutionary Command Council Headquarters. Burned frames of PC workstations visible on shelves. All rooms sharing walls with this storage room were untouched from fire or battle damage.


 (click on picture to enlarge thumbnail)

Courtesy: CIA - Burned Documents Found at SAAD Center: An exploitation team on a recent mission to the SAAD Center, part of the Baghdad New Nuclear Design Center, found massive looting and the remnants of deliberately destroyed documents. Other documents were left untouched, however, and recovered by the team.

(Link)  Iraqi Perspectives Project - Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents Via, ABCNews.com (pdf file)

TW 3/12/2008   

 

                                          All Rights Reserved 2002-  2008

Unauthorized advertising including pop up ads is strictly prohibited without the expressed written consent from TheXReport.com and its registrant. Any pictures on this website that are marked TheXReport.com and All Rights Reserved or Copyright are owned solely by the registrant and TheXreport.com and any duplication, reproduction or retransmission of any type is hereby prohibited without the expressed written and implied consent of TheXReport.com and its registrant.

 

  Click on picture above or link below to watch the video. The 9-11 Plot


      (photo by Amir Kholoosi)

The Shahab-3 Missile     The intelligence the NIE conveniently left out (omits). The missile has the ability to deliver a nuclear warhead. The Iranians tested the missile in Aug. 2004 and tweaked it in early 2005.                      Iran Unnerved/thexreport (1/24/2005)

Read about or listen to nuclear physicist David Albright and Radio Farda (RFE/RL) discuss the Shahab-3 missile in conjunction with Iranian plans to build what look like a re-entry vehicle for a nuclear warhead. The information (designs) was compiled onto a laptop computer, then brought out of Iran and later obtained by U.S. intel agencies. The information contained on the laptop dealt with the 2001 - 2003 time period. RFE/RL story dated 12/2005                        

(click here to listen, uses  Real Audio)

(click here to listen, uses  Windows Media Player) 

If either of those links don't work, read about it here, but it is better to listen to it: RFE/RL.org    

But what happened after 2003 time period, the NIE has conveniently omitted.

The Iranians shifted gears and continued with development and perfection of the nuke delivery capable Shahab-3 missile.

To prove this, during the interview between David Albright and Radio Farda, Albright noted the Aug. 2004 Shahab-3 missile test, "Iran appears to have learned some lessons". Albright said Iran was going in the right direction with the triconic (nose cone) design of the missile if they wanted to build a re-entry vehicle that can better deliver a nuclear warhead, citing accuracy, avoiding detection, etc.. Albright implied this was a better design than the drawings on the laptop which covered the 2001-03 time period. Indicating continued development. (connect the dots time) TW 12/7/2007

The footnote on bottom of page 6 of the NIE states: For the purposes of this Estimate, by "nuclear weapons program" we mean Iran's nuclear weapon design and weaponization work and covert uranium conversion-related and uranium enrichment -related work; we do not mean Iran's declared civil work related to uranium conversion and enrichment. 

Definition of Weaponization: make into or use as a weapon or a potential weapon; alter, change, modify - cause to change; make different; cause a transformation

The failure of the State Department (3) not to include Iran's continued development of their intermediate range ballistic missiles (including the Shahab -3) and its capability to deliver a nuclear warhead in the NIE was meant to intentionally mislead the American people and discredit the Bush administration. Putting us into danger, again. TW 12/7/2007

Link to NIE:     NYTimes.com (pdf file)