|
Where Was Barack Obama
When This Was Happening?
If he is such a smart and informed
leader, why didn't he try and stop the impending
disaster? You mean he does not have the ability to take
a set of facts and see where they are going to lead to?
This raises some very serious questions. There are only
two distinct possibilities.
The Catalyst
(this is what started the economic
downturn) Anyone who tries to tell you
differently, either does not understand, is just plain
stupid, or is trying to cover it up (because they were
making money off the increase in price per barrel of
oil, and or for political gain).
[This is what I wrote and
warned on 06/03/2005, date of chart, 04/01/2005]
Anyone reading
this will note, I was sounding the warning about what
would happen to the economy if the oil and energy prices
continue to rise. Was my intelligence and analysis
right on?
Oil Prices
Here we go again. More BS to keep the prices as
high as they can keep them. If the government would freeze or stop
futures trading of oil, then the price would fall to below 40 dollars a
barrel or less in a week. This very same scenario happened to silver 20
some years ago in a scheme that drove the price up to 50 dollars an
ounce before the government stopped it. This is all a "bogus
speculation scheme and greed" and the American public is paying the
price for it. Its time for the American public to pick a few
high profile companies and boycott them. Because if a major company
sales fell 80% in a month, because of oil protests, they would be
calling their senators and getting this natural gas and oil BS under
control.
There are futures traders who just look for any reason
to pump up the price of oil whether it be legit or not. Lately, bogus
reasons (manipulation) have again surfaced and have had an impact to
drive up the price of crude. I wonder if this is what Mr. Bubbles
(Greenspan) meant when he said market forces should decide and set the
price of oil? The traders think Greenspan just gave them the green light
to make the prices of crude futures to go higher.
It wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't an element of
political mischief in this too. Those knowing full well as oil prices
and natural gas prices go up, Bush's poll numbers go down. And I say
that with a little educated knowledge. And there is not any shortage
of crude, period! Even Rush Limbaugh said that too. I'd freeze that
market before Sunday morning. Even for a temporary 30 days and get a
good look at who is invested in these futures and company stocks.
It just simply amazes me. I ask myself, how could
the price of oil be allowed to hit these record highs in a time of war?
Just unbelievable. And right after a direct assault on our economic
infrastructure by the 9/11 terrorist and their sponsors, the price
of crude oil, gasoline, and natural gas is allowed to climb unabated
over a three and a half year period all the while going virtually and
seemingly unnoticed by anyone. Unbelievable.
I wonder how much the U.S. economy can actually
"weather" before it finally cracks?
TW 6/03/2005
link: Oil
Prices
Oil Prices
The X Report warned about the price of energy over a year ago
and that it was a national security concern. I just knew, the country and Bush
were going to take a big hit if anything else happened on a catastrophic scale. So I started
digging around and pulled a
monthly crude price chart which I believed showed the oil companies and trading
system was taking advantage of a situation. Analyzing that chart, to me, indicated
from Nov. 2001 forward, the price of crude continued to climb unabated for no good
long term reason. In essence, I believed what was occurring was nothing less than war profiteering.
Then my worst fears came true. Hurricane Katrina hit and
subsequently, the price of crude
continued to climb right off the chart. Just imagine what the price could be if
something else catastrophic happens. At this rate, $5.00 per gallon would not be
unimaginable.
In retrospect, again, without changing my opinion, what
occurred was the traders took advantage of every situation to run up the price
and the energy companies have reaped unbelievably high profits, setting new
records highs each quarter.
Many of the reasons for price increases were completely bogus. It seemed that any
reason at all they could come up with, real or
imaginary, they pumped it. Played it like It was only game in town, and no one did
anything about it, until now.
Now, I'm not going to give it all away, lets just see who is
smart enough to figure it all out and who the players involved are and how to
find the evidence. Any one who thinks they know, use the feedback form and I
will let you know if you got it.
Be forewarned, the chart is shocking and telling. I've had
tens of thousands of hits on it and the search for it continues. And even more
shocking is the traders are talking about running the price of crude to One Hundred Bucks Per
Barrel !
TW 04/22/2006
link:
Most Recent Articles [about half way down the
page listed as "Oil Prices"]
[Editors note, you don't find this
kind of accurate work on any discussion forum]
TW 02/09/2009
1/19/2008 - Terrorist William Ayers
Halted At Border - Then Sent Back By Canadian Customs &
Immigration To The U.S.
Today, news sites and blog websites
lit up after multiple reports from Canada,
indicated the border & immigration service
stopped Weather Underground founder and terrorist leader
William Ayers entry into Canada Sunday night. The
reasons Ayers was denied entry according to sources,
would have been multiple.
First, he would be deemed a threat by border security
due to his connections with terrorism, and secondly a 1969
conviction during an anti-war demonstration.
Ayers was
given the opportunity to have a hearing on the matter,
but refused when he found out he would be held in detention,
until the date of the hearing which could have been a
week or two away.
This is where this story gets
interesting and has very long legs. There are legitimate
questions being raised by discrepancies surrounding the relationship
between President elect Obama and terrorist William
Ayers. A relationship which appears to have multiple
dates that connect a confluence of events.
According the AP news service today,
they claim, without any attribution, Ayers and Obama
were never close friends. But according to American Issues Project Org.,
they claim that Obama and Ayers were friends. (see video clip by American
Issues Project Org, below)
Former vice presidential candidate
Sarah Palin is on the record during the 2008
Presidential election campaign, having claimed and
indicating that, Obama was "palling around with
terrorist", explicitly indicating that Obama and Ayers
relationship, was closer than what Obama wants known,
or has publicly admitted to.
American Issues
Project Organization made the youtube video clip
during the 2008 presidential election. They implied on the
clip that Obama was friends with William Ayers, the
American unrepentant terrorist, and that Obama and him
served together on a left wing board. Also, according to
American Issues Project, Obama's political career was
launched in the living room of William Ayers in Chicago.
A fact that is not disputed by Obama, but downplayed.
Perhaps, inaccurately by alluding to Ayers as just
another person from the hood, judging from the multiple
connecting events shared between the two..
related information
AP Report
-
Ayers denied entry to Canada
Canada - The Star.com
William Ayers turned back at Canadian border
1/19/2008 TW
The
Real Prague Connection
(The
Evidence The MSM Doesn't Want You To Know)
(click on thumbnail images to enlarge)
(See additional reporting, evidence and analysis below)
Update 9/8/2006
U.S. Senate Committee on
Intelligence
Links to Iraq Intelligence Phase
II Report (link provided below)
Postwar Findings about Iraq's WMD Programs and Links to
Terrorism and How they Compare with Prewar Assessments
First, my pictures are of a
meeting which took place in the winter of 2000 and not
of a April 9, 2001 alleged meeting between Atta and al
Ani. So no one should become confused with the
dates.
According to the Senate Committee
on Intelligence, this is what al Ani told his FBI
interrogators, but what he said and claims does not
surprise me. Spies do cover their tracks, and al Ani
would have covered his tracks after he learned that we
were attempting to make a connection. As for the undated
document recovered, that would be part of his cover, a
planted document disavowing a meeting. No one should
ever expect al Ani to tell anyone he met with lead
hijacker Mohammed Atta in Prague "on any date" and
incriminate himself.
(click on thumbnail
image to enlarge)
Notice how the Senate Intelligence
Committee does not acknowledge or report openly, on my
pictures showing Atta meeting with al Ani during the
winter of 2000. Possibly, could it be that some
former high level official dropped the ball on this one?
I bet al Ani was very surprised,
especially after he saw surveillance photo's of himself
and with Atta.
TW 9/8/2006
Update 9/10/2006
Vice President Cheney on Meet the
Press with Tim Russert (link in red below)
MSNBC Meet the Press Transcript for 9/9/2006
Vice President Cheney today on
Meet the Press confirmed the existence of my photo's. He
also detailed that there have been several different
reports of Atta in Prague.
Concerning my pictures, if I
understand the Vice President correctly, he says the
C.I.A. and the F.B.I. cannot verify that Atta was with
al Ani in Prague . Well of course not. He was trained in
the Afghanistan terrorist training camps to plan, work
and travel undetected.
As I discussed before, Atta was
using fake passports. The 9-11 commission confirmed in
their report Atta was trained in altering passport
identifications. You can also be sure he was trained in
counter surveillance methods. After all, he was the al
Qaeda operational commander and they were in the
planning stages for 9-11 and would have wanted to go
undetected so as not to compromise the operation.
I never published the large
picture located above before April 4, 2006. I published
a smaller and darker picture in October of 2002 to
protect what I felt was vital intelligence and interest.
In part of my analysis, not disclosed until April
2006, the larger photo above shows moles located near
the right side of the eyebrow at exactly the same
locations as on smaller photo's of Atta located above.
If I can crack FSB/KGB
intelligence operations with a high degree of accuracy,
surely, with a 98% degree of confidence based on my
photographic analysis, the man with al Ani in the large
picture is 9-11 terrorist Mohammed Atta.
TW 9/10/2006
Update 9/12/2006
( X-Rayed)
On this additional part of my
analysis I kept secret, you will see on the large photo
located above that was taken in Prague, moles located
just to the right side of the chin/lower jaw area also
matches with the black and white photo of Atta.
TW 9/12/2006
Update 10/7/2006
The picture on the left hand side
below, with the exception of what I have highlighted, is
in its original form that was released by Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) after the 9-11
attacks.
In the black and white photo's
located above and below on the right hand side, you will
notice the moles on the on the right side of Atta's face
behind the chin area, are not seen as easily in the
color picture released by FDOT. The reason they
were not seen in the photo released by FDOT, is because
there has been an intentional attempt at covering up
(photo shopped) the identifying markings and obscuring
the unique shape and depth of his chin/jaw area.
I am not inclined to believe the
camera for some reason, did not focus on that area
correctly because the disturbance does not extend beyond
Atta's facial outline and is limited only to the chin
and jaw area..
I have ruled out that FDOT would
allow touch-ups of a photo for a driver's license, and
if Atta was using cosmetic make-up to cover up his
markings, this would not cause a pixelation disturbance
as the photo's clearly show.
The type of camera used, according
to FDOT (confirmed), was a digital camera.
click on picture to enlarge
click on picture to enlarge
Original Picture
Converted to
Grayscale
(xrayed)
TW 10/7/2006
added 7/30/2007: "The type of
camera used, according to FDOT (confirmed), was a
digital camera".
Update 4/07/2008
There have been numerous attempts
to discredit the Atta meeting with Saddam’s intelligence
official Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim al Ani in Prague of the
Czech Republic. None of which were so blatantly obvious
and I believe with possible malicious intent, than when
the New York Times (using unnamed sources) attempted to
discredit a meeting in Prague very early on in October
of 2002.
The New York Times ran the article on October 21, 2002
stating as fact the President of the Czech Republic
discretely called the White House and reported there was
not any evidence a meeting occurred.
But the New York Times report was precisely and swiftly
denied as a "fabrication".
The following report was published on 10/22/2002 (with
full attribution) on the matter: CZECH REPUBLIC
PRESIDENTIAL SPOKESMAN REJECTS 'NY TIMES' REPORT AS
'FABRICATION.' A spokesman for Czech President Vaclav
Havel has dismissed a report in "The New York Times"
claiming Havel told U.S. officials there is no evidence
that suspected 11 September hijacker Mohammad Atta met
an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague, CTK reported on
22 October. The 21 October report cited unidentified
Czech officials as saying Havel discreetly called White
House officials to cast doubt on the alleged meeting.
"It is a fabrication. Nothing like this has occurred,"
Havel's spokesman, Ladislav Spacek, said of the alleged
phone conversation". ("RFE/RL Newsline," 22 October)
Link to report:
RADIO FREE EUROPE/ RADIO LIBERTY (about
half way down the page)
"The photo's are supporting evidence". No amount of
disinformation and or faulty reporting can change that".
The other covertly snapped photo (above) shows Saddam's
intelligence official al Ani in a surveillance operation
against an American interest. RFE/RL is an American
interest. Which is funded by the U.S. Congress.
Was the New York Times story an attempt to
cover-up and poison
potential evidence? It all depends, on who was feeding the
disinformation to the New York Times. Was it a current Czech government official at
the time? Or was it a former Czech government official at the time? Or was it someone
with an axe to grind, and the New York Times just made it up, time will tell.
One thing is for sure, their sourcing if any was full of
it.
Another fact. On Oct. 21,2002, the New York Times was reporting the
alleged meeting of April 2001 was discredited. But, I
know differently (with solid proof). To the contrary,
the alleged April 2001 meeting was still being debated
in Prague at the time of their reporting on 10/21/2002.
To reiterate, my photo's are of a meeting "during the
winter of 2000", not of the alleged April 2001
meeting.
What is very interesting, is the
fact I published the photo's for the first time on
10/22/2002, which coincides with the reporting..
Someone knew I was going to publish those photo's, and
tried to obfuscate (confuse) the facts.
TW 4/7/2008
Updated 10/29/08 TW
Syrian President Assad
Inciting The Palestinians and Arabs
Syrian President Assad's Baath Party Organized
Demonstration (photo by albaath news)
Syria’s State Run News Services quote
Syrian President Assad as saying Israel is a terrorist.
I monitor the statements from the Middle East very
closely. “There is not“, any mention or condemnation of
Hamas terrorist organization firing rockets into Israel.
This is a strong indicator that Assad and Syria is
directing the Hamas terrorist organization. If that
wouldn’t be the case, they would be condemning the
rocket launches by Hamas and attempting to stabilize the
situation through peaceful means.
Here is a quote by the “Syrian State Run albaath news
agency“: “Syria has stepped up political and
diplomatic contacts with Arab and international levels
to promote and support the Gaza Strip in the face of
aggression, calling for an immediate stop”
This statement makes no mention about the aggression of
Hamas firing rockets into Israel. But wants Israel to
stop defending itself.
Here is another quote from the same news article: “
President Assad held a telephone conversation the day
before yesterday, all of Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani,
the Emir of Qatar, Colonel Muammar Qaddafi, Leader of
the September Revolution in Libya, and presidents Omar
al-Bashir and Yemeni Ali Abdullah Saleh, Abdelaziz
Bouteflika, which called for the convening of an
emergency Arab summit to discuss the grave situation in
the Gaza Strip and ways to repel the Israeli aggression
against the Palestinian people”
Repel the Israeli aggression? This statement makes no
mention of the hundreds rockets fired into Israel by
Hamas recently. The statement calls for ways to “repel”
the aggression by Israel. They are twisting the facts.
Israel is simply defending herself.
This is solid proof that Syria’s Assad is propagating
and directing Hamas. What more proof does anyone need?
This is a long running tragic policy failure. This is
more easily explained to be like a two-headed octopus
with tentacles, than that of anything else. The two
heads of the octopus identified are one, Syria and
President Assad and secondly, Iran and President
Ahmadinejad. The tentacles are the numerous terrorist
organizations run and supported by Syria and Iran.
The pressure needs to be applied to Assad and Syria, and
pressure applied equally to Iran and Ahmadinejad,
coupled along with military action to put down the
constant rocket attacks against Israel. If diplomatic
pressure does not work, then the other military options
should seriously be considered and implemented.
This aggression by Syria, Hamas and Iran, reeks of
Obama’s failed policy of sending Robert Malley into
Syria before he was elected president. By promising
Syria, that Obama will pressure Israel into withdrawing
back to the pre 1967 war boundaries. But another fact
should also be considered. Iran and Syria wants Israel
wiped off the map entirely. That is their ultimate goal,
but they will take it one step at a time, anything they
can get towards that goal.
If this unrest and skirmish heats up, and it has the
potential, President Bush should send out warnings (and
mean it) to the markets he will freeze the oil commodity
markets (whatever it takes), and protect the American
and world economies. TW 12/29/08
link to article referenced above:
http://www.albaath.news.sy/user/?id=464&a=42823
Very Related information:
Former Chief UNSCOM weapons inspector Richard Spertzel
says Syria and Iraq were responsible for the 2001
anthrax attacks against the U.S., link:
False and Flawed Logic (anthrax & Ivins)
Obama Misrepresented His
Campaign and Intentions To Get Elected
(One More Reason Allied Intel Agencies
Won’t Cooperate With Obama)
Meeting with terrorist
Recently, Barack Obama
dispatched Adviser Robert Malley to Syria and Egypt,
according to Philadelphia’s “The Bulletin” newspaper of
Nov. 7, 2008. Robert Malley, according to Israeli sources and British
sources, say he has ties to Syrian President Bashar
Assad and HAMAS, the organization the U.S. State Dept.
has designated a terrorist organization operating inside
of Syria. Syria has been designated a state sponsor
of terrorism, by the U.S. State Dept., through
direct Syrian Gov't. support for HAMAS, and other
terrorist groups located inside Syria.
Citing a New York Times article dated May 13, 2008 and
titled: Confronting Questions, Obama Assures Jews of His
Support, Mr. Obama gave a speech to Jewish Leaders in
Philadelphia, Pa.. He told them “We must not negotiate
with a terrorist group intent on Israel’s destruction."
In a Time Magazine article dated May 15, 2008 and
titled: HAMAS Hysteria, Joe Klein wrote a piece, Obama
stated, "I've repeatedly condemned [Hamas]. I've
repeatedly said ... since [Hamas] is a terrorist
organization, we should not be dealing with them until
they recognize Israel, renounce terrorism and abide by
previous agreements."
In that same article, Joe Klein wrote “To reinforce this
message, Obama dropped Robert Malley of the
International Crisis Group (ICG) from his list of
advisers. Malley's offense had been to meet with Hamas
leaders."
In the New York Times article cited
above, on Friday (insert: May 9,2008), Robert Malley,
who was a special adviser on Arab-Israeli affairs to
President Bill Clinton, severed his ties to the Obama
campaign after he learned that The Times of London was
preparing to publish an article disclosing direct
contacts he had with Hamas. Mr. Malley is an official of
the International Crisis Group, an independent nonprofit
entity whose activities include gathering information on
terrorist groups and conflicts.
Mr. Malley said he had been an informal adviser to the
campaign. Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the Obama
campaign, said that description applied to “literally
hundreds of people.”
“He has no formal role in the campaign and will not play
one in the future,” Mr. Vietor said.
A senior foreign policy adviser to Mr. Obama said, Mr.
Malley had contributed “one paper to one of our policy
teams several months ago, and that was the extent of
it.”
So, according to the New York Times and Tommy Vietor, a
spokesman for the Obama campaign. Mr. Malley is just an
informal adviser. If he was just an informal adviser,
why did Barack Hussein Obama just send him as an envoy
to Syria and Egypt?
And according to Barack Hussein Obama’s own words, “We
must not negotiate with a terrorist group intent on
Israel’s destruction." Yet Obama just sent a nobody
envoy to do just that, negotiate with a State (Syria)
sponsor of terrorism. This is Obama's faulty logic,
pretend the Syrian Gov't. isn't involved in the direct
support and direction of HAMAS. So that makes everything
alright.
In yet another inconsistency, by Mr. Vietor, a spokesman
for the Obama Campaign, “He (Mr. Malley) has no formal
role in the campaign and will not play one in the
future." But according to “The
Bulletin” of Nov. 7, 2008, for someone who has not and will
not play a role, and then sent by President elect Barack
Hussein Obama, was a misrepresentation by his campaign
to get him elected, by earning votes (induce) from the Jewish
community and others.
According to the “Time” magazine article, dated on May
15, 2008, “Obama dropped Robert Malley of the
International Crisis Group (ICG) from his list of
advisers. Malley's offense had been to meet with Hamas
leaders." However, according to Philadelphia’s “The
Bulletin” of Nov. 7, 2008, Obama has just sent a nobody envoy, that he
dropped as an adviser, to negotiate with a terrorist
supporting nation (Syria) and possibly negotiate with
the terrorist organization HAMAS.
The intentional misrepresentations by Obama and his
campaign, have been aimed at securing [induce] the Jewish vote
and others.
This would indicate to an allied intelligence agency,
Barack Hussein Obama cannot be trusted, and his word is
as good as mud.
Obama could never obtain a high level
security clearance, or pass a background check,
because of his connections to radicals and terrorist.
Since this is the actual case, it is obvious he cannot
do his job as set forth in the oath taken to be
President of the U.S..
Further, Obama can’t even tell the truth to the American
public, how would he “solemnly swear (or affirm) that he
will faithfully execute” any of his proscribed duties to
uphold the U.S. Constitution?
Note: TheXReport.com contacted The
Bulletin of Phila.. The Bulletin stands by its reporting
and its sources unequivocally.
Note: TheXReport.com contacted the
Editor and President of Middle East Newsline, Steve
Rodan said, the reporting is solid.
TW 11/08/2008
Related Articles
What Robert Malley Is
Telling The Syrians
Evidence - Malley Was In
Contact With The Syrians
Barack Obama's anti-Israel and
controversial adviser Robert Malley (Mali in Syria), has
been working behind the scenes, to undermine the Bush
Administration's Middle East foreign policy, especially
regarding Syria and Israel.
According to the State run Syrian
Arab News Agency (SANA), and the State run
albaath News Agency, this is what Malley is
telling them in Syria. Both of these articles is dated
11/01/2008. Right before the election.
Note, I had the story translated from
Arabic to English. During translation, some words are
not in their correct order. So you will have to reverse
some or delete repetitious words or meanings.
There is propaganda in the articles.
The propaganda is Malley telling the Syrian's that
McCain would follow Malley's advice. To the contrary, McCain does not
support Israel withdrawing back to pre-1967 borders.
From State Run SANA:
Experts and analysts as saying that "the policy of the
administration of President George W. Bush failed to
Syria" and that Damascus "in a stronger position having
proved their absorptive capacity and face pressure from
Washington for over eight years."
The statements come in the wake of four American
helicopters attack last Sunday on a farm in the village
of Sugar City Albuqmal targeted a building under
construction, killing 8 people and wounding others.
The analysts added that "the new U.S. administration,
whether headed by Democratic candidate Barack Obama or
Republican John McCain will try to take advantage of the
open window between Syria and Israel to achieve peace."
The fourth round of indirect talks between Syria and
Israel under the auspices of Turkish concluded in early
August, was postponed in the fifth round of talks to an
Israeli request by internal political developments in
Israel due to the resignation of Ehud Olmert, the
Israeli prime minister, and that the new government
headed by Tzipi Livni his successor so far.
For his part, the Director of the Middle East Program at
the International Crisis Group Robert Malley, "There is
an opportunity to improve U.S. relations with Syria
after the policy Bush has to ask Damascus to respond to
Washington's demands without offering anything in
return," he said.
He pointed out that Mali "as a result of this policy has
become Damascus now in a better position as they stood
in the face of the worst and was able to absorb
pressure, and Syria are playing a good role in the
region."
The United States is working on a policy to isolate
Syria regionally and internationally to respond to its
demands on Iraq, Lebanon disengagement with Iran
The Mali that "there is a chance to turn the page, and
that Obama advisers will discuss how to seize the
opportunity to renew the relationship with Syria."
Mali said that "any future U.S. administration, whether
headed by Obama or McCain would be willing to intervene
directly in the Syrian-Israeli negotiations if it would
lead to a peace agreement."
The Mali that "if Obama won, Syria will be one of the
major regional parties will negotiate with the new
administration to arrange the withdrawal of U.S. troops
from Iraq in accordance with the timetable set by the
initial candidate is the restoration of democratic
forces within 18 to 24 months."
(NOTE THE LAST PARAGRAPH IN THE
NEXT ARTICLE)
From State Run Syrian Albaath News:
Analysts and experts said
that the new U.S. administration, whether headed by
Democratic candidate Barack Obama or Republican John
McCain will try to take advantage of indirect
negotiations between Syria and Israel to achieve peace.
The analysts agree that it
was now established that the policy of the
administration of President George W. Bush failed to
Syria and Damascus made it in a stronger position having
proved their absorptive capacity and face pressure from
Washington for over eight years.
Said Robert Malley, Middle
East program director at the International Crisis Group
said that there would be an opportunity to improve
relations with Syria after the policy Bush has to ask
Damascus to respond to Washington's demands without
offering anything in return it.
The Mali: that the outcome
of this policy has become Damascus now in a better
position as they stood in the face of the worst and was
able to absorb pressure and Syria are playing a good
role in the region.
The Mali, there is a chance
to turn the page and that Obama advisers will discuss
how to seize the opportunity to renew the relationship
with Syria.
He added: that any future
U.S. administration, whether headed by Obama or McCain
would be willing to intervene directly in the
Syrian-Israeli negotiations if it would lead to a peace
agreement.
He (Malley) pointed out that
if Obama wins, Syria will be one of the major regional
parties will negotiate with the new administration to
arrange the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq in
accordance with the timetable set by the initial, a
Democratic candidate of troops within 18 to 24 months.
He noted that Mali there is
a real chance for peace after the restoration of Syria
for the entire occupied territories.
TW11/15/2008
Original albaath news agency article link
Original SANA news agency article link
Conservatives and
Republicans Be Proud
We did the best we could and
even then some. Obama’s campaign had many more resources
than we had by far. We did a good job with what we had
to work with. I still believe, our issues and points put
forth, were accurate and the right ones for this
country. If we would have had the same financial
resources, we would have creamed them. But, we should
work with Obama for the good of the nation, as much as
we can. To prevent him from turning this into a
Marxist/Socialist country.
By no stretch of the imagination, are we going to relinquish our
conservative principals, lower our guards and rollover
and play dead.
As I stated before the vote what would happen,
Central Pennsylvania counties delivered for the McCain/Palin
ticket, with the exception of four counties, out
of a total 32.
McCain/Palin won Central Pa. by 12.6% (double digits). See link:
Pa.
General Election Returns
Map of Central Pa., Red denotes
counties voting for McCain/Palin 2008
McCain/Palin 799,166 (56.3%) - Obama/Biden
620,449 (43.7%)
Read More -
Conservatives and
Republicans Be Proud
Sampling Central Pa. - The Polls Have
Tightened In The Battle Ground States
According to a number of people that I interviewed in Central Pa., for the most part,
don’t want Obama as President. The reasons varied, but
the reasons that stood out, was his connections to radicals
and his socialist viewpoints. So the messages have got
out. From the people I spoke with, they are taking this
very seriously. They just don’t trust
him, based on what he stands for. These weren’t wealthy
people for the most part, they were working class people, like behind
counters, or walking down the street, etc.. And they are
making a special effort to vote against Obama.
Read More -
Sampling Central Pa. - The Polls Have
Tightened In The Battle Ground States
Barack
Obama - The Sum Of All Fears II
Karl Rove on Fox News stated a couple of times recently,
that he wondered why some of this damning negative
information about Barack Obama hasn’t come out and
pushed before, long before this. That is a good question
. Actually, there were some people writing and talking
about Obama’s connections to terrorist and radicals. But
they weren’t gaining much traction. No one was
listening, and all others had their own ideas, agenda
(driven by the buck),
choice of candidate and methods for winning an election.
All except the facts. Read More -
Barack
Obama - The Sum Of All Fears II
Barack Obama & Raila Odinga - Just Another
Terrorist From The Hood
Obama’s 2006 Terrorist/Radical
Connections
In August 2006, Barack Obama traveled to
Kenya for six days to specifically campaign for Raila
Odinga. A
Marxist radical who has a proven recorded
history, that supports the use of lethal violence to
affect political change.
Barack Obama used his U.S. Senatorial Position in 2006
as a tool to promote Raila Odinga’s campaign for the
Kenyan Presidency. To some Kenyans, the very sight of a
U.S. Senator endorsing Odinga at his campaign rallies,
would imply the U.S. Government supported Odinga.
Definitely not true.
The “change” theme has been used by both Odinga and
Obama campaigns, “Spread the Wealth” slogan
has also been used by both. A Marxist/Socialist concept.
Obama & Raila Odinga in Kenya Aug. 2006
Raila Odinga, is a member of the Luo tribe, the very
same as Obama‘s biological father. Odinga claims Obama
is his cousin. He told the BBC News, Senator Obama’s
father was his maternal uncle. Barack Obama has not
denied the BBC News Report.
Raila Odinga was educated in communist East Germany.
Odinga’s father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga was a communist.
Odinga’s Terrorist Buddies
Raila Odinga, along with other Kenyan
radicals from their hood, were arrested after a 1982
bloody coup attempt, which failed. Odinga was initially
charged with treason. The state never tried him on the
charges, but deemed him such a threat, they decided to
keep him in detention for six years. He was released in
Feb. 1988, but was re-arrested six months later in a
dissident crackdown, for his involvement in a
revolutionary movement, and then released in June of
1989. Only to be re-arrested again.
Barack Obama cannot say he was only 8 years old in 2006 like
when he used that excuse trying to downplay his
connections to domestic terrorist William Ayers, who
committed terrorist acts against the U.S.. (see video
below)
 Click
youtube video to watch - William Ayers, Domestic
terrorist
Its not like Barack Obama walked into a blind
arrangement with Odinga. Obama positively knew of
Odinga’s past, and deliberately campaigned for this
radical in Kenya in 2006, using his U.S. Senatorial
position as clout to help him get elected.
Raila Odinga’s other associations are just as radical
and subverted as he is. For example, in 2007, Raila
Odinga met with this man in the picture below on
occasions. He is Gilbert Deya, a Kenyan who was living
in U.K., and who operated the Gilbert Deya Ministries.
photo by raila2007.org
Gilbert Deya (L) Raila
Odinga (R) in London 2007
Gilbert Deya claimed he had magical
powers to impregnate sterile women. An investigation of
the claims, proved Gilbert Deya and his wife perpetrated
a fraud when authorities using DNA testing, showed they
did not match the miracle babies with their supposed
biological parents. None of them matched.
Read More -
Barack Obama & Raila Odinga - Just Another
Terrorist From The Hood
All Rights Reserved 2002- 2009
Unauthorized advertising including pop up ads is
strictly prohibited without the expressed written
consent from TheXReport.com and its registrant. Any
pictures on this website that are marked TheXReport.com
and All Rights Reserved or Copyright are owned solely by
the registrant and TheXreport.com and any duplication,
reproduction or retransmission of any type is hereby
prohibited without the expressed written and implied
consent of TheXReport.com and its registrant. Contact:
thexreport at rocketmail.com
|
